Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916728›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2023

Diagnosis of frailty and implications on surgical process in the elderly: A narrative review.

Paola Aceto, Chiara Schipa, Ersilia Luca, Chiara Cambise, Claudia Galletta, Concezione Tommasino, Liliana Sollazzi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Paola AcetoFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).
Chiara SchipaFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).
Ersilia LucaFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).
Chiara CambiseFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).
Claudia GallettaFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).
Concezione TommasinoFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).
Liliana SollazziFrom the Dipartimento di Scienze dell'Emergenza, Anestesiologiche e della Rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy (PA, CS, EL, CC, CG, LS), Dipartimento di Scienze biotecnologiche di base, cliniche intensivologiche e perioperatorie, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy (PA, LS) and Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy (CT).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Longevity has increased the proportion of the elderly in the population, and as a result ageing has become the leading factor for diseases such as cerebrovascular and cardiovascular disorders. It also makes surgical procedures more complex with potential life-threatening complications. In order to further investigate the role of ageing in modern healthcare, the term 'frailty' has been proposed to describe a condition of reduced functional reserve that leads to an increased risk of adverse health outcomes. The aim of this study was to review the pathophysiology of frailty and to highlight the most important tools to diagnose it, and their ability to predict the postoperative outcome. There are two major conceptual models that provide guidance for the detection of frailty: the Fried Phenotype Model and the Cumulative Deficit Model. These two main models have provided a base from which the assessment of frailty has developed. Two frailty assessment tools, the modified frailty index and the simplified frailty index play a key role in the preoperative setting because of their predictive power for postoperative risk quantification. Assessments of independence and/or cognitive function represent the main components that an ideal frailty tool should have to identify elderly people who are at risk of postoperative functional and cognitive deterioration. Cognitive impairment undoubtedly has a high association with frailty, but cognitive status is not included in many frailty assessments. In this regard, comprehensive geriatric assessment is a more complete evaluation tool, and it should be used whenever a frailty tool screening gives a positive result. Finally, frailty assessment is useful to explore the cumulative effect of comorbidities on the ageing patients' functional reserves and to identify the appropriate level of in-hospital and postdischarge care.

Identifiers

PMID39916728
PMCPMC11798398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.