Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916710›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2025

A nursing and midwifery training program in Kathmandu on antimicrobial resistance and stewardship and infection prevention and control: a qualitative and quantitative outcomes and process evaluation.

Jamuna Tamrakar Sayami, Rakchya Amatya, Kshitij Karki, Deepak Bajracharya, Basudha Shrestha, Sreenidhi Srinivasan, Tyler Prentiss, Anita Shallal, Marcus Zervos, Katie Latack and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jamuna Tamrakar SayamiNational Centre for Health Profession Education, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Rakchya AmatyaGroup for Technical Assistance, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Kshitij KarkiGroup for Technical Assistance, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Deepak BajracharyaGroup for Technical Assistance, Lalitpur, Nepal.
Basudha ShresthaKathmandu Model Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal.
Sreenidhi SrinivasanHenry Ford Health, Global Health Initiative, Detroit, MI, United States.
Tyler PrentissHenry Ford Health, Global Health Initiative, Detroit, MI, United States.
Anita ShallalHenry Ford Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit, MI, United States.
Marcus ZervosHenry Ford Health, Division of Infectious Diseases, Detroit, MI, United States.
Katie LatackHenry Ford Health, Public Health Sciences, Detroit, MI, United States.
Linda KaljeeHenry Ford Health, Global Health Initiative, Detroit, MI, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are disproportionately affected by antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Nurses and midwives are essential to a holistic approach to AMR stewardship (AMS) and IPC within LMICs. Objective: (1) Adapt AMS and IPC training programs and practice guidelines for community- and hospital-based nurses and midwives in Nepal; (2) pilot and conduct training outcome and process evaluations. Design: A one-day training was developed through partnerships between Henry Ford Health and nursing and midwifery organizations and teaching facilities in Nepal. Quantitative outcome and process evaluations were conducted. Qualitative process evaluation interviews were conducted with purposefully selected trainees. Settings: Trainees worked in healthcare facilities in Kathmandu Valley. Participants: A total of 126 nurses and midwives participated in the training and the quantitative evaluation. Eighteen trainees participated in the process evaluation interviews. Methods: The 10-module program was adapted from AMS and IPC materials from the World Health Organization and the Nepal Ministry of Health and Population, and curricula from previous AMS studies in Nepal. Key outcomes were AMS and IPC knowledge, and decision-making about empirical dispensing of antibiotics. The process evaluation focused on training content, integration into practice, implementation barriers, and recommendations for dissemination. Quantitative data analysis included descriptive and bivariate analysis. Qualitative data analysis included coding, searches, review of coded texts, and identification of patterns and themes. Results: AMS and AMR knowledge increased at immediate [1.40 (1.06-1.74) CI 95%] and six-month post-training [0.71 (0.35-1.08) CI 95%]. IPC knowledge also increased at immediate [0.79 (0.55-1.03) CI 95%] and six-month post-training [0.72 (0.49-0.96) CI 95%]. At immediate post-training, an increasing number of respondents indicated that they would not dispense antibiotics for adults [14.74% (4.88, 24.60%) CI 95%] and children [8.13% (-1.88, 18.14%) CI 95%] with fever and sore throats, and for non-pregnant women with burning sensation when urinating [10.69% (0.68%, 20.71%) CI 95%]. Process evaluation data indicated positive responses to the training content and relevancy to practice. Conclusion: The AMS-IPC training increased knowledge and decreased intentions for dispensing antibiotics. Participants provided concrete examples of implementation of learnings into practice. Trainings will be adapted to address identified content needs and challenges to implementation.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipInfection ControlMidwiferyAdultFemaleHumansMaleNepalProgram EvaluationQualitative Researchantimicrobial stewardshipinfection prevention and controlNepalprogram evaluationSouth Asia

Identifiers

PMID39916710
PMCPMC11799561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.