ArticleFrontiers in public health2025
Variations in vitamin D status among Chinese children aged 1-6 years during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotype-specific 25-hydroxyvitamin D and fat-soluble vitamin profiles in girls with pediatric endocrine disorders: a large cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Association Between Serum Vitamin D Levels and Metformin Efficacy in Obese Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study Based on HbA1c Reduction.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2026Article
- Prevalence and correlates of vitamin D deficiency in a mixed-age hospital-based cohort.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Vitamin D Status in Children: Romania's National Vitamin D Screening Programme in Context of the COVID-19 Pandemic.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Vitamin D deficiency has been a critical global health issue within the pediatric population. Closed-off management brought about by the COVID-19 pandemic has drastically impacted outdoor activities and sunlight exposure, however, whether it indirectly further exacerbated the vitamin D deficiency has not been largely investigated, especially among children in China. The purpose of this study was to evaluate 25(OH)D concentrations in children before and during the COVID-19 lockdown and to analyze the factors influencing their vitamin D status. Methods: A cross-sectional survey included children aged 1-6 years from Han Zhong Central Hospital in the southern Shanxi Province of China. This study examined healthy children from a pediatric health care department over two periods: before COVID-19 (March 2019-February 2020), and during COVID-19 (March 2020-February 2021). Total 25(OH)D concentrations were compared between the two observation periods. Vitamin D status was determined by 25(OH)D concentrations: deficient (<20 ng/ml), insufficient (20-29 ng/ml), and sufficient (30-100 ng/ml). Results: The study involved 6,780 children, with 52.8% being 1-year-olds, 23.1% being 2-year-olds, and 24.1% being 3 to 6-year-olds. Boys and girls were 52.8 and 47.2%, respectively. The actual prevalence of deficiency in vitamin D nutritional status among children was 2.8%, with 87.1% of cases in those aged 3 to 6 years. Vitamin D insufficiency was 18.3%, affecting 54.8% of the same demographic. The average of 25(OH)D concentration were 38.2 ± 9.8 ng/ml, significantly varying by age and season. 25(OH)D concentrations decreased with age, from 42.3 ± 8.8 ng/ml at 1-year-olds to 37.4 ± 8.2 ng/ml at 2-year-olds, and further to 30.2 ± 8.1 ng/ml at 3 to 6-year-olds. Seasonal variations showed that 25(OH)D concentrations were higher in spring (38.7 ± 10.1 ng/ml), summer (38.7 ± 10.0 ng/ml), and fall (38.6 ± 9.2 ng/ml) in comparison to winter (36.0 ± 9.8 ng/ml). Additionally, the concentrations of 25(OH)D in spring exhibited a decrease during the COVID-19 pandemic (37.9 ± 10.3 ng/ml) in comparison to the pre-pandemic measurements (39.3 ± 9.9 ng/ml) ( Conclusion: The research indicated that vitamin D deficiency is uncommon among Chinese children, with 25(OH)D concentrations experiencing a notable decline in those aged 3-6 years. The findings suggested a potential need for tailored supplementation strategies and possibly higher doses for this age group, along with monitoring 25(OH)D concentrations to evaluate supplementation effectiveness. COVID-19-related restrictions minimally affected children's 25(OH)D concentrations, revealing the nutritional implications of the pandemic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.