Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916700›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience of consciousness2025

The influence of signal strength on conscious and nonconscious neural processing of emotional faces.

Insa Schlossmacher, Marie Herbig, Torge Dellert, Thomas Straube, Maximilian Bruchmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience of consciousness, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Insa SchlossmacherInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, von-Esmarch-Str. 52, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9283-5352
Marie HerbigInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, von-Esmarch-Str. 52, Münster 48149, Germany.
Torge DellertInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, von-Esmarch-Str. 52, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7475-7474
Thomas StraubeInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, von-Esmarch-Str. 52, Münster 48149, Germany.
Maximilian BruchmannInstitute of Medical Psychology and Systems Neuroscience, University of Münster, von-Esmarch-Str. 52, Münster 48149, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8897-1252

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consciously perceived emotional relative to neutral facial expressions evoke stronger early and late event-related potential (ERP) components. However, the extent of nonconscious neural processing of emotional information in faces is still a matter of debate. One possible reason for conflicting findings might relate to threshold effects depending on the sensory strength of stimuli. In the current study, we investigated this issue by manipulating the contrast of fearful and neutral faces presented with or without continuous flash suppression (CFS). Low, medium, and high contrasts were calibrated individually so that faces were consciously perceived at all contrast levels if presented without CFS. With CFS, however, low- and medium-contrast faces remained nonconscious, while high-contrast faces broke the suppression. Without CFS, ERPs showed an increased early negativity and late positivity in response to fearful vs. neutral faces regardless of contrast. Under CFS, we observed differential early negativities for suppression-breaking high-contrast fearful vs. neutral faces. For nonconscious faces, however, the contrast level modulated the difference between fearful and neutral faces, showing enhanced early negativities only at medium contrast and an inverted effect at low contrast. Additional analysis of late positivities provided evidence for the absence of an effect at low and medium contrast, while at high-contrast, fearful faces elicited a larger positivity than neutral ones. Taken together, our findings demonstrate the significance of stimulus strength for nonconscious emotion processing under CFS, implying that early negative ERP differences between neutral and fearful faces depend on stimulus contrast near the detection threshold.

Indexed as

continuous flash suppressioncontrastEEGfacial expressionnonconscious processingstimulus strength

Identifiers

PMID39916700
PMCPMC11799861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.