ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2025
Physical-aware model accuracy estimation for protein complex using deep learning method.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid Approach to Protein-Protein Complex Affinity Prediction Based on Language Models and Molecular Dynamics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Efficient global accuracy estimation for protein complex structural models using multi-view representation learning.Cell reports methods · 2026Article
- Highlights of Model Quality Assessment in CASP16.Proteins · 2026Article
- SpheronizaTor: Spherical Voxelization for Interpretable Protein Microenvironment Modeling.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2026Article
- AlphaFold in protein structure and function prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the breakthrough of AlphaFold2 on monomers, the research focus of structure prediction has shifted to protein complexes, driving the continued development of new methods for multimer structure prediction. Therefore, it is crucial to accurately estimate quality scores for the multimer model independent of the used prediction methods. In this work, we propose a physical-aware deep learning method, DeepUMQA-PA, to evaluate the residue-wise quality of protein complex models. Given the input protein complex model, the residue-based contact area and orientation features were first constructed using Voronoi tessellation, representing the potential physical interactions and hydrophobic properties. Then, the relationship between local residues and the overall complex topology as well as the inter-residue evolutionary information are characterized by geometry-based features, protein language model embedding representation, and knowledge-based statistical potential features. Finally, these features are fed into a fused network architecture employing equivalent graph neural network and ResNet network to estimate residue-wise model accuracy. Experimental results on the CASP15 test set demonstrate that our method outperforms the state-of-the-art method DeepUMQA3 by 3.69 % and 3.49 % on Pearson and Spearman, respectively. Notably, our method achieved 16.8 % and 15.5 % improvement in Pearson and Spearman, respectively, for the evaluation of nanobody-antigens. In addition, DeepUMQA-PA achieved better MAE scores than AlphaFold-Multimer and AlphaFold3 self-assessment methods on 43 % and 50 % of the targets, respectively. All these results suggest that physical-aware information based on the area and orientation of atom-atom and atom-solvent contacts has the potential to capture sequence-structure-quality relationships of proteins, especially in the case of flexible proteins. The DeepUMQA-PA server is freely available at http://zhanglab-bioinf.com/DeepUMQA-PA/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.