Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916685›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care2022

General anaesthesia for nonobstetric surgery during pregnancy: A narrative review.

Tom Bleeser, Janine C Vally, Marc Van de Velde, Steffen Rex, Sarah Devroe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of anaesthesiology and intensive care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tom BleeserFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven (TB, JCV, MVDV, SR, SD) and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (TB, MCV, SR, SD).
Janine C VallyFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven (TB, JCV, MVDV, SR, SD) and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (TB, MCV, SR, SD).
Marc Van de VeldeFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven (TB, JCV, MVDV, SR, SD) and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (TB, MCV, SR, SD).
Steffen RexFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven (TB, JCV, MVDV, SR, SD) and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (TB, MCV, SR, SD).
Sarah DevroeFrom the Department of Anaesthesiology, UZ Leuven (TB, JCV, MVDV, SR, SD) and Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (TB, MCV, SR, SD).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nonobstetric surgery may be required in up to 1% of pregnancies. Most common procedures are urgent abdominal surgeries requiring general anaesthesia. Maintaining normal maternal physiology during anaesthesia is vital. Left lateral tilt position prevents aortocaval compression and preserves normal venous return. Preparation for a difficult airway is required in all obstetric patients due to the known anatomical and physiological changes. Aspiration prophylaxis and a rapid sequence induction are traditionally recommended to avoid the (probably overestimated) risk of aspiration. Although the minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of volatile anaesthetic agents is reduced by 30 to 40%, awareness occurs more frequently in the obstetric population. Maternal outcomes from surgery are comparable with those of nonpregnant women, but increased incidences of foetal loss, preterm delivery, low birth weight and caesarean section have been reported. Although animal studies have observed impaired foetal brain development after antenatal exposure to anaesthesia, the translational value of these studies remain controversial. Clinical evidence is nearly absent. Withholding urgent/essential procedures is certainly more threatening than proceeding with the surgery. To increase the safety of mother and foetus, nonurgent or nonessential procedures should be postponed until after delivery, and if procedures cannot wait, locoregional anaesthesia should be used if possible. Where general anaesthesia cannot be avoided, the duration of exposure should be kept to a minimum. This narrative review summarises the literature of the past 20 years concerning the anaesthetic management and outcomes of nonobstetric surgery under general anaesthesia during pregnancy.

Identifiers

PMID39916685
PMCPMC11783665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.