ArticleThe Journal of dermatology2025
Long-term real-world effectiveness of deucravacitinib in psoriasis: A 52-week prospective study stratified by prior apremilast or biologic therapy.
Article in The Journal of dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Deucravacitinib for Plaque Psoriasis: A Multicenter Study in Korea.Annals of dermatology · 2026Article
- Deucravacitinib in dermatology: current indication and existing off-label data.Drugs in context · 2026Review
- Review of Promising Off-Label Use of Deucravacitinib.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Long-term real-world effectiveness of deucravacitinib in psoriasis: A 52-week prospective study stratified by prior apremilast or biologic therapy.The Journal of dermatology · 2025Article
- Biologics and small molecules for psoriasis: current and future progress.Drugs in context · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Real-world evidence on the long-term effectiveness of deucravacitinib, a selective tyrosine kinase 2 inhibitor for psoriasis, remains limited, particularly in patients with different histories of systemic treatments. We evaluated the 52-week effectiveness of deucravacitinib in patients with psoriasis, stratified by a history of apremilast or biologic usage. This prospective, single-center study included 110 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who received daily deucravacitinib (6 mg). Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) scores during the treatment were analyzed in subgroups stratified by a history of apremilast or biologic usage. Deucravacitinib decreased PASI and DLQI scores for 52 weeks in psoriasis patients, both with and without prior apremilast or biologic usage. The percent reductions from baseline PASI or DLQI at week 52 were similar in apremilast-experienced patients (92% or 77.9%) and apremilast-naive patients (88.3% or 81.6%), respectively. The achievement rates of PASI 100 or absolute PASI ≤1 at week 52 in apremilast-experienced patients (30.8% or 61.5%) were slightly higher than those in apremilast-naive patients (20.5% or 46.2%). The percent reductions from baseline PASI or DLQI at week 52 in biologic-naive patients (91.6 or 82.8%) were slightly higher than those in biologic-experienced patients (57.6% or 63.6%), respectively. The achievement rates of PASI 75, 100 or absolute PASI ≤1 at week 52 in biologic-naive patients (84.4%, 24.4%, or 53.3%) were slightly higher than those in biologic-experienced patients (57.1%, 14.3%, or 28.6%), respectively. Deucravacitinib generated sustained 52-week effectiveness in diverse patient subgroups, supporting its role as a universal treatment for psoriasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.