ArticleJournal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition2025
Pediatric endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: 3-year experience.
Article in Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pediatric endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: 3-year experience.Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition · 2025Article
- The application of gastrointestinal endoscopy in children: a narrative review.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Review
- EUS in pediatric patients.Endoscopic ultrasoundReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesLiver biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing and staging liver diseases. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) has been reported in adults with equivalent or better safety profiles than percutaneous liver biopsies. The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the safety and efficacy of EUS-LB in pediatric patients.
methodsThis was a retrospective chart review of consecutive pediatric patients undergoing EUS-LB at Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center from March 2020 to April 2023. Patients ≤21 years old were included. EUS-LB was performed via fine-needle biopsy technique with transduodenal and/or transgastric approach. Histology was independently reviewed by one of two expert pathologists, including length (cm) and complete portal tract (CPT) number per the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) adequacy criteria. Demographics, clinical data, technical information, diagnostic success, and adverse events were recorded.
resultsEighty-three patients were included in the analysis, with various indications that required liver biopsy. All biopsies achieved diagnostic and technical success, with 77 (93%) meeting both AASLD criteria for adequacy. Most patients (57, 69%) underwent biopsy of both hepatic lobes, with an overall median of two needle passes. Total specimen length was a median of 7.9 cm (interquartile range [IQR] 5.2-10.3), and the median maximum intact specimen was 4.2 cm (IQR 3.1-5.4). The median CPT number was 24 (IQR 17-32) per patient. Four mild adverse events (5%) occurred; none involved bleeding.
conclusionsEUS-LB was well tolerated and yielded samples that were technically and diagnostically successful in a pediatric population, with comparable safety to percutaneous liver biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.