ArticleJournal of stroke2025
Narrowings of the Deep Cerebral Perforating Arteries Ostia: Geometry, Structure, and Clinical Implications.
Article in Journal of stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Injecting nerves with radiological contrast as a novel method of studying the peripheral nervous system.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Parent Artery Disease-Related Stroke: What Is the Impact on Endovascular Treatment? A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Pontine infarction isolated to trigeminal sensory fibers: a case report.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Patency of the lenticulostriate and Pontine arteries after stenting of the intracranial arteries.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Neonatal Perforator Stroke: Timing, Risk Factors, and Neurological Outcome from a Single-Center Experience.Neurology international · 2025Article
- Perforator-sparing basilar artery reconstruction normalizes pathological hemodynamics in vertebrobasilar dolichoectasia: a CFD study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeThe pathogenesis of neurovascular diseases and various types of dementia is tightly connected to cerebral circulation. An area that requires further exploration is the system of deep cerebral perforating arteries-arteries branching directly from high-pressure intracranial arteries, supplying vital neural structures such as the internal capsule, and characterized by a diameter of well below 1 mm, which makes them difficult to visualize with standard radiological examinations. This study aimed to analyze the morphology of the perforator origins, which constitute connection points between high-pressure intracranial arteries and microcirculation.
methodsTwenty-three human basal ganglia specimens with the middle cerebral artery (MCA, including 172 perforating arteries) and ten brainstem specimens with the basilar artery (BA, including 162 perforating arteries) were prepared and scanned using microcomputed tomography. The geometry and structure of the perforating arteries were analyzed using radiological images and additional histological studies.
resultsThe ostia of the perforating arteries were ellipsoidal in shape with median stenosis severity of 23% and 20% for MCA and BA perforators, respectively. The local narrowing structure was typical of neointimal hyperplasia. Statistical analysis revealed that the severity of stenosis may be related to age and cardiovascular health.
conclusionOrigins of the deep cerebral perforators are locally narrowed by neointimal hyperplasia, which may be a protective mechanism to adjust high blood pressure to the microcirculation. The narrowings may lead to chronic hypoperfusion and play a role in the pathophysiology of cerebral small vessel disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.