ReviewJournal of stroke2025
Neurovascular Complications of Acute Aortic Syndrome.
Review in Journal of stroke, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Development of a scoring system for the involvement of supra-aortic vessel in patients with type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Transposition of an isolated left vertebral artery during aortic arch replacement for Stanford type A aortic dissection.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Patterns as Indicator of Perioperative Stroke in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Clinical features of type A aortic dissection initially presenting with neurological symptoms: a single-center case series.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute aortic syndromes (AAS) such as aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, and penetrating aortic ulcer pose significant neurovascular risks, affecting patient outcomes. This review examines the incidence, clinical presentation, and outcomes of neurovascular complications in AAS patients. Common complications include stroke, spinal cord ischemia, and transient ischemic attacks, with stroke being the most prevalent. Managing aortic dissection necessitates careful blood pressure control to prevent dissection progression while avoiding compromised cerebral and spinal perfusion. Carotid involvement, particularly dissection, increases stroke and transient ischemic attack risks. Emergency surgical interventions, though essential to prevent rupture or repair dissection, carry risks of perioperative neurovascular complications. The use of electroencephalography and transcranial Doppler can aid in the early detection and monitoring of neurovascular events. We discuss the pros and cons of certain blood pressure medications in the acute treatment of aortic dissection. A multidisciplinary approach involving cardiovascular surgeons, neurologists, and critical care specialists is vital for optimizing outcomes and mitigating risks. Early recognition and management of neurovascular complications are crucial, and further research is needed to develop targeted prevention and treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.