Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916426›Full record

ArticleCurrent pharmaceutical biotechnology2025

Clinical and Prognostic Implications of an Alternative Splicing-related Risk Model Based on TP53 Status in Breast Cancer.

Xinrui Wang, Zhoujie Ye, Liping Zhou, Yujia Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Current pharmaceutical biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Xinrui WangMedical Research Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000, PR China.
Zhoujie YeMedical Research Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000, PR China.
Liping ZhouMedical Research Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000, PR China.
Yujia ChenMedical Research Center, Fujian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, College of Clinical Medicine for Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pediatrics, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, 350000, PR China.

Funding

Joint Funds for the Innovation of Science and Technology, Fujian Province 2021Y9184Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China 2020J05278
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast Cancer (BRCA) is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Abnormal Alternative Splicing (AS) is frequently observed in cancers. Understanding the intricate relationship between gene mutations and abnormal AS is vital for developing novel diagnostic and therapeutic strategies to effectively target cancer.

objectiveThis study aimed to focus on the analysis of transcriptomic splicing events in patients with Breast Cancer (BRCA), particularly those with mutations in the TP53 gene. Understanding the role of AS may be helpful in revealing potential predictive indicators for survival and treatment strategies.

methodsThe splicing data were downloaded from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer project, incorporating 972 patients in the study, classified according to TP53 mutation status. A comprehensive splicing profile of these breast tumors was outlined, and an interaction network of Alternative Splicing (AS) events and splicing factors was constructed. This allowed for the identification of specific AS events associated with TP53-mutant breast cancer. A prognostic risk model based on AS events was established, using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses. To understand the molecular heterogeneity, consensus clustering analyses of prognostic AS events were performed. We also investigated the association of AS patterns with the immune microenvironment and drug sensitivity.

resultsA total of 4519 significant Alternative Splicing (AS) events were distributed among 2729 genes that were altered in TP53 mutant tumors. Based on the analysis of these events, a prognostic risk model was created involving ten AS events from ten genes (such as NKTR, CD46, VCAN, etc.). The survival analysis showed that patients with high-risk scores had significantly poorer overall survival (p<0.001, HR=2.46, 95% CI 1.90-3.18) than those with low-risk scores. Furthermore, the study identified four molecular subtypes related to AS events (C1, C2, C3, and C4), which showed significant differences in immune cell infiltration, with C1 and C4 clusters having a higher degree of immune cell infiltration than C2 and C3. The chemosensitivity analysis revealed that these different AS clusters have different sensitivities to several anticancer drugs, such as docetaxel, paclitaxel, and doxorubicin, with C1 and C4 clusters being more sensitive than the other clusters.

conclusionWe have demonstrated differential transcriptomic splicing events between TP53 mutant and wild-type cases of breast cancer, establishing an effective prognostic risk model based on AS events. These findings provide new insights that may aid in understanding the biological behavior of breast cancer and potentially in optimizing treatment strategies for breast cancer.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingBreast NeoplasmsTumor Suppressor Protein p53FemaleHumansMutationPrognosisTP53 protein, humanTumor Suppressor Protein p53alternative splicingBreast cancergene mutationimmunotherapy.prognosisTP53

Identifiers

PMID39916426

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.