Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916419›Full record

ArticleThe plant pathology journal2025

Diagnosis Anthracnose of Chili Pepper Using Convolutional Neural Networks Based Deep Learning Models.

Hae-In Kim, Ju-Yeon Yoon, Ho-Jong Ju

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The plant pathology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hae-In KimDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.
Ju-Yeon YoonDepartment of Plant Protection and Quarantine, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.
Ho-Jong JuDepartment of Agricultural Biology, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju 54896, Korea.

Funding

Korea Institute of Planning and Evaluation for Technology in Food, Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesMinistry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs 120080-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), one of the most economically important vegetable crops globally, faces significant economic risks from anthracnose, leading to yield losses of 10% as well as decreasing marketability. Early and accurate detection is essential for mitigating these effects. Recent advancements in deep learning, particularly in image recognition, offer promising solutions for plant disease detection. This study applies deep learning models-MobileNet, ResNet50v2, and Xception-using transfer learning to diagnose anthracnose in chili peppers. A key challenge is the need for large, labeled datasets, which are costly to obtain. The study aims to identify the minimum dataset size required for accurate and efficient disease diagnosis using limited data. Performance metrics, including precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy, were evaluated across different dataset sizes (500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, and 4,000 samples). Results indicated that model performance improves with larger datasets, with ResNet50v2 and Xception requiring more data to achieve optimal accuracy, while MobileNet showed strong generalization even with smaller datasets. These findings underscore the effectiveness of transfer learning-based models in plant disease detection, offering practical guidelines for balancing data availability and model performance in agricultural applications. Source code available at https://github.com/smart-able/Anthracnose.git.

Indexed as

computer visiondetection methodsimage datasetplant diseasetransfer learning

Identifiers

PMID39916419
PMCPMC11834499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.