ArticleThe plant pathology journal2025
Diagnosis Anthracnose of Chili Pepper Using Convolutional Neural Networks Based Deep Learning Models.
Article in The plant pathology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chili pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), one of the most economically important vegetable crops globally, faces significant economic risks from anthracnose, leading to yield losses of 10% as well as decreasing marketability. Early and accurate detection is essential for mitigating these effects. Recent advancements in deep learning, particularly in image recognition, offer promising solutions for plant disease detection. This study applies deep learning models-MobileNet, ResNet50v2, and Xception-using transfer learning to diagnose anthracnose in chili peppers. A key challenge is the need for large, labeled datasets, which are costly to obtain. The study aims to identify the minimum dataset size required for accurate and efficient disease diagnosis using limited data. Performance metrics, including precision, recall, F1-score, and accuracy, were evaluated across different dataset sizes (500, 1,000, 2,000, 3,000, and 4,000 samples). Results indicated that model performance improves with larger datasets, with ResNet50v2 and Xception requiring more data to achieve optimal accuracy, while MobileNet showed strong generalization even with smaller datasets. These findings underscore the effectiveness of transfer learning-based models in plant disease detection, offering practical guidelines for balancing data availability and model performance in agricultural applications. Source code available at https://github.com/smart-able/Anthracnose.git.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.