Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39916302›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2025

Identification of Social Risk-Related Referrals in Discrete Primary Care Electronic Health Record Data: Lessons Learned From a Novel Methodology.

Jenine Dankovchik, Rachel Gold, Aileen Ochoa, Jenna Donovan, Rose Gunn, Suzanne Morrissey, Cristina Huebner Torres, Ned Mossman, Seth A Berkowitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jenine DankovchikResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3880-0164
Rachel GoldResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Aileen OchoaResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Jenna DonovanResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Rose GunnResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Suzanne MorrisseyResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Cristina Huebner TorresDepartment of Research and Population Health, Caring Health Center, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.
Ned MossmanResearch OCHIN, Inc., Portland, Oregon, USA.
Seth A BerkowitzDivision of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1030-4297

Funding

SOCRATES: SOCial Risk and diAbetes ouTcomEs StudyR01DK125406 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BERKOWITZ, SETH A · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK125406NIDDK NIH HHS R01DK125406
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the utility of using discrete primary care electronic health record (EHR) data to identify social risk referrals in a national network of community-based clinics. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY

settingPrimary data were abstracted from the OCHIN network EHR (June 2016 to February 2022) of 1459 community-based clinics across the United States. STUDY

designStructured data elements included 913 commonly used smartphrases and 53 procedure codes that were considered potential indicators of social risk referrals. Using stratified purposive sampling, we compared these discrete data with clinical notes to assess concordance of social risk referral documentation, and of the prevalence, types, and outcomes of such referrals. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION

methodsSmartphrases were classified into three categories (likely, possible, or unlikely to indicate a social risk referral); 50 chart notes were sampled for each of the 25 most frequently used smartphrases in each category, and for 53 of the most frequently used procedure codes. A total of 6104 chart notes were reviewed. PRINCIPAL

findingsIn 59% of chart notes where discrete data suggested a social risk referral occurred, there was no documentation of this in the note. Primary domains addressed were food insecurity (38%), financial stress (18%) and housing needs (18%). Common referral activities included providing contact information (26%), help with assistance applications (17%), and direct provision of resources (16%). Documentation indicated the patient received resources in 29% of notes.

conclusionsEHR documentation of social risk referrals in structured data fields is inconsistent. Further work should establish best practices, especially given emerging policies that tie payments to documentation of social risk screening and intervention provision. Community health centers may struggle to use data elements such as smartphrases and procedure codes to monitor and report on their social risk referrals until standardized coding practices are established and effectively implemented.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPrimary Health CareReferral and ConsultationFemaleHumansMaleSocial Determinants of HealthUnited Stateselectronic health recordsreferralssocial needssocial riskstructured data

Identifiers

PMID39916302
PMCPMC12052516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.