Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915983›Full record

ArticleMolecular plant pathology2025

Genomic Biosurveillance of the Kiwifruit Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae Biovar 3 Reveals Adaptation to Selective Pressures in New Zealand Orchards.

Lauren M Hemara, Stephen M Hoyte, Saadiah Arshed, Magan M Schipper, Peter N Wood, Sergio L Marshall, Mark T Andersen, Haileigh R Patterson, Joel L Vanneste, Linda Peacock and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular plant pathology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Lauren M HemaraSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0316-3545
Stephen M HoyteRuakura Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0694-8436
Saadiah ArshedMount Albert Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3073-8631
Magan M SchipperRuakura Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6887-2989
Peter N WoodThe New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hawke's Bay, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9080-2506
Sergio L MarshallRuakura Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-3993-7031
Mark T AndersenMount Albert Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-6743-5525
Haileigh R PattersonSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-5313-4323
Joel L VannesteRuakura Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-4877-0667
Linda PeacockKiwifruit Vine Health, Mount Maunganui, New Zealand.
Jay JayaramanMount Albert Research Centre, The New Zealand Institute for Plant and Food Research Limited, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4959-9467
Matthew D TempletonSchool of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-0192-9041

Funding

Zespri International Ltd
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the late 2000s, a pandemic of Pseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae biovar 3 (Psa3) devastated kiwifruit orchards growing susceptible, yellow-fleshed cultivars. New Zealand's kiwifruit industry has since recovered, following the deployment of the tolerant cultivar 'Zesy002'. However, little is known about the extent to which the Psa population is evolving since its arrival. Over 500 Psa3 isolates from New Zealand kiwifruit orchards were sequenced between 2010 and 2022, from commercial monocultures and diverse germplasm collections. While effector loss was previously observed on Psa-resistant germplasm vines, effector loss appears to be rare in commercial orchards, where the dominant cultivars lack Psa resistance. However, a new Psa3 variant, which has lost the effector hopF1c, has arisen. The loss of hopF1c appears to have been mediated by the movement of integrative conjugative elements introducing copper resistance into this population. Following this variant's identification, in-planta pathogenicity and competitive fitness assays were performed to better understand the risk and likelihood of its spread. While hopF1c loss variants had similar in-planta growth to wild-type Psa3, a lab-generated ∆hopF1c strain could outcompete the wild type on select hosts. Further surveillance was conducted in commercial orchards where these variants were originally isolated, with 6.6% of surveyed isolates identified as hopF1c loss variants. These findings suggest that the spread of these variants is currently limited, and they are unlikely to cause more severe symptoms than the current population. Ongoing genome biosurveillance of New Zealand's Psa3 population is recommended to enable early detection and management of variants of interest.

Indexed as

ActinidiaAdaptation, PhysiologicalGenomicsPlant DiseasesPseudomonas syringaeGenome, BacterialNew Zealandcopper resistanceeffector lossgenome surveillancePseudomonas syringae pv. actinidiae

Identifiers

PMID39915983
PMCPMC11802661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.