Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915951›Full record

ArticleStatistics in medicine2025

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Using the Propensity Score With Competing Risks in Survival Analysis.

Peter C Austin, Jason P Fine

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Empirical Antibiotic Activity and Outcomes in Pediatric Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections: A Rank-based Composite Outcome Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Peter C AustinICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3337-233X
Jason P FineDepartment of Statistics, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.

Funding

CIHR PJT 183902
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score allows estimation of the effect of treatment in observational studies. We had three objectives: first, to describe methods for using IPTW to estimate the effects of treatments in settings with competing risks; second, to illustrate the application of these methods using empirical analyses; and third, to conduct Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the relative performance of three methods for estimating time-specific risk differences and time-specific relative risks in settings with competing risks. In doing so, we provide guidance to applied biostatisticians and clinical investigators on the use of IPTW in settings with competing risks. We examined three estimators of time-specific risk differences and relative risks: the weighted Aalen-Johansen estimator, an estimator that combines IPTW with inverse probability of censoring weights (IPTW-IPCWs), and a double-robust augmented IPTW estimator combined with IPCW (AIPTW-IPCW). The design of our simulations reflected clinically realistic scenarios. Our simulations found that all three estimators tended to result in unbiased estimations of time-specific risk differences and time-specific relative risks. However, the weighted Aalen-Johansen estimator and the AIPTW-IPCW estimator tended to result in estimates with greater precision compared to the IPTW-IPCW estimator. In our empirical analyses, we illustrated the application of these methods by estimating the effect of statin prescribing on the risk of subsequent cardiovascular death in patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.

Indexed as

Propensity ScoreComputer SimulationHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsModels, StatisticalMonte Carlo MethodMyocardial InfarctionObservational Studies as TopicProbabilityRisk AssessmentSurvival AnalysisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorscompeting riskcumulative incidence functioninverse probability of treatment weightingpropensity scoresurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID39915951
PMCPMC11803134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.