ArticleStatistics in medicine2025
Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Using the Propensity Score With Competing Risks in Survival Analysis.
Article in Statistics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oseltamivir for Treatment of Influenza Among Outpatient Veterans: Target Trial Emulation.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Trial
- Empirical Antibiotic Activity and Outcomes in Pediatric Gram-negative Bloodstream Infections: A Rank-based Composite Outcome Analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026Article
- Pooled Multinomial Logistic Regression for Parametric G-computation in the Presence of Competing Events.Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Comparative atrial fibrillation risk across Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in B-cell malignancies: A nationwide population-based study.British journal of haematology · 2026Article
- The choice of mitral valve surgery type and mid-term outcomes in patients up to 70 years of age: Results of the AUTHEARTVISIT study.JTCVS open · 2026Article
- Illustrating Implications of Misaligned Causal Questions and Statistics in Settings With Competing Events and Interest in Treatment Mechanisms.Statistics in medicine · 2026Article
- The Efficacy and Safety of Dehydrated Alcohol Versus Lauromacrogol for Sclerotherapy of Simple Renal Cysts: A Retrospective Comparison Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Risk of Suicide in Patients With Traumatic Injuries.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Emphysema Phenotype and 1‑Year Readmission Risk After Acute Exacerbation of COPD: A Real-World Study Using Propensity Score-Based Methods.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026Article
- Risk of Seizure Associated With Concomitant Use of Tramadol and Antidepressants in Older Nursing Home Residents.Neurology · 2025Article
- Accounting for Misclassification of Cause of Death in Weighted Cumulative Incidence Functions for Causal Analyses.Statistics in medicine · 2025Article
- Association of initiating CYP2D6-metabolized opioids with risks of adverse outcomes in older adults receiving antidepressants: A retrospective cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score allows estimation of the effect of treatment in observational studies. We had three objectives: first, to describe methods for using IPTW to estimate the effects of treatments in settings with competing risks; second, to illustrate the application of these methods using empirical analyses; and third, to conduct Monte Carlo simulations to evaluate the relative performance of three methods for estimating time-specific risk differences and time-specific relative risks in settings with competing risks. In doing so, we provide guidance to applied biostatisticians and clinical investigators on the use of IPTW in settings with competing risks. We examined three estimators of time-specific risk differences and relative risks: the weighted Aalen-Johansen estimator, an estimator that combines IPTW with inverse probability of censoring weights (IPTW-IPCWs), and a double-robust augmented IPTW estimator combined with IPCW (AIPTW-IPCW). The design of our simulations reflected clinically realistic scenarios. Our simulations found that all three estimators tended to result in unbiased estimations of time-specific risk differences and time-specific relative risks. However, the weighted Aalen-Johansen estimator and the AIPTW-IPCW estimator tended to result in estimates with greater precision compared to the IPTW-IPCW estimator. In our empirical analyses, we illustrated the application of these methods by estimating the effect of statin prescribing on the risk of subsequent cardiovascular death in patients discharged from the hospital with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.