Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915941›Full record

Observational studyScandinavian journal of primary health care2025

Differences in use of telemedicine integrated into traditional primary health care - a comparative observational study.

Pär Eriksson, Maria Randjelovic, Hans Thulesius, Tora Hammar, Stefan Lagrosen, Evalill Nilsson

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scandinavian journal of primary health care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Pär ErikssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-9546-9930
Maria RandjelovicDepartment of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköpings Universitet, Linköping, Sweden.
Hans ThulesiusDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Tora HammarDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Stefan LagrosenDepartment of Management, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.
Evalill NilssonDepartment of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Telemedicine in primary health care is expected to address many of the issues currently challenging service delivery. However, the impact and effect will depend on who will use the new technology.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to investigate differences between users and non-users of telemedicine integrated into traditional office-based primary health care.

methodsQuantitative registry-based population study in two regions in the southeast part of Sweden (

resultsUsers were more often women under the age of 60 and had higher morbidity (measured as resource utilisation) than non-users (

conclusionsOur findings suggest that users are more likely to be women and below the age of 60. Likewise, users also tend to have a greater need for health care services compared to non-users, and they seek health care more often compared to non-users. No differences regarding SES were found.

Indexed as

Patient Acceptance of Health CarePrimary Health CareTelemedicineAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRegistriesSocial ClassSwedenYoung Adulte-consultationhealth care seeking behaviourQuantitative studyresource utilisationtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39915941
PMCPMC12090274

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.