Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915931›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of social determinants of health and health services2025

Missed Nuances in Tuberculosis Research: Reflections from a Tibetan Scholar.

Nawang Yanga

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of social determinants of health and health services, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Nawang YangaGraduate Program in Health Policy and Equity, York University, Toronto, Canada.ORCID 0009-0009-0572-5194

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acknowledging and valuing the lived experiences of scholars from the Global South is crucial for more nuanced, refined, and equitable approaches to and interpretations of research. The sheer lack of Tibetan scholars authoring and leading studies within the Tibetan diaspora is especially concerning. The paucity of Tibetan scholars in tuberculosis (TB) discourse is a marker and product of the colonization of academic global health and of global inequities in opportunity and credibility. The lack of Tibetan voices, advocates and scholars alike, in the TB discourse creates ambiguities and misinterpretations, and a general unwillingness to dig deeper into the social, cultural, economic, and historical contexts under which TB thrives in this community. It also symbolizes the lack of opportunity faced by many scholars based in the Global South. Efforts to decolonize global health must also parallel efforts to address other related injustices.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchTuberculosisGlobal HealthHumansTibetdecolonizationglobal healthGlobal Southrefugeestuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID39915931
PMCPMC12171065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.