Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915886›Full record

ReviewCritical care (London, England)2025

Assessment of recruitment from CT to the bedside: challenges and future directions.

Stefano Giovanazzi, Domenico Nocera, Giulia Catozzi, Francesca Collino, Massimo Cressoni, Lorenzo Ball, Onnen Moerer, Michael Quintel, Luigi Camporota, Luciano Gattinoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Stefano GiovanazziDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany. stefanogiovanazzi94@gmail.com.
Domenico NoceraDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Giulia CatozziDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Francesca CollinoDepartment of Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Emergency, AOU Città Della Salute E Della Scienza Di Torino, Corso Bramante 88, 10126, Turin, Italy.
Massimo CressoniUnit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30, 20097, San Donato Milanese, Italy.
Lorenzo BallDepartment of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostics, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Onnen MoererDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Michael QuintelDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Luigi CamporotaCentre for Human & Applied Physiological Sciences, School of Basic & Medical Biosciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Luciano GattinoniDepartment of Anesthesiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Robert-Koch-Str 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing and quantifying recruitability are important for characterizing ARDS severity and for reducing or preventing the atelectrauma caused by the cyclic opening and closing of pulmonary units. Over the years, several methods for recruitment assessment have been developed, grouped into three main approaches: 1) Quantitative CT Scanning: This method accurately measures the amount of atelectatic lung tissue that regains aeration; 2) Regional Gas Volume Measurement: Based on anatomical markers, this approach assesses gas volume within a specified lung region; 3) Compliance-Based Gas Volume Measurement: This technique compares actual gas volume at a given pressure to expected values, assuming respiratory system compliance is constant within the explored pressure range. Additional methods, such as lung ultrasonography and electrical impedance variation, have also been explored. This paper details the distribution of opening and closing pressures throughout the lung parenchyma, which underpin the concept of recruitability. The distribution of recruitable regions corresponds to atelectasis distribution, with the pressure needed for recruitment varying according to whether the atelectasis is "loose" or "sticky." We also discuss the effects of different PEEP levels on preventing atelectrauma, the importance of keeping some lung areas closed throughout the respiratory cycle, and briefly cover the roles of sigh ventilation, prone positioning, and the closed lung approach.

Indexed as

Respiratory Distress SyndromeTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansLungPositive-Pressure RespirationPulmonary AtelectasisAcute respiratory distress syndromeMechanical ventilationPositive end expiratory pressureRecruitment

Identifiers

PMID39915886
PMCPMC11800554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.