Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915870›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Barriers to healthcare access among female youths in Mozambique: a mixed-effects and spatial analysis using DHS 2022/23 data.

Habtu Kifle Negash, Hiwot Tezera Endale, Hailu Aragie, Winta Tesfaye, Mihret Getnet, Tseganesh Asefa, Yibeltal Yismaw Gela, Alebachew Ferede Zegeye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Habtu Kifle NegashDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia. habtuk8@gmail.com.
Hiwot Tezera EndaleDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Hailu AragieDepartment of Anatomy, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Winta TesfayeDepartment of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Mihret GetnetDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Public Health, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Tseganesh AsefaDepartment of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Yibeltal Yismaw GelaDepartment of Human Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
Alebachew Ferede ZegeyeDepartment of Medical Nursing, School of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccess to healthcare involves timely and affordable service availability. Barriers, such as economic and geographic factors, particularly affect low- and middle-income countries. This study analyzes the spatial distribution and socio-economic determinants of healthcare access barriers among female youths in Mozambique to inform targeted interventions.

methodsData from the Mozambique Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2022/23 on maternal and child health was analyzed. Using a stratified two-stage sampling design, 619 enumeration areas were selected, including 5,743 female youths aged 15-24. Barriers were assessed based on finances, distance, permission, and safety, with independent variables like age, education, wealth index, marital status, and community factors. Analyses included multilevel logistic regression and spatial methods (Global Moran's I, SaTScan) using Stata 17 and ArcGIS 10.7 to identify barriers and clusters.

resultsThis study found that 49.10% (95% CI: 47.81%, 50.39%) of female youths reported barriers to healthcare access, primarily due to financial difficulties (40.69%) and distance (38.16%). Youths aged 20-24 were 15% lower odds of facing barriers (AOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.73, 0.99). Those with no formal education were 2.18 times more likely to face barriers (AOR = 2.18, 95% CI: 1.22, 3.88). Youths from poor and middle-wealth households were 1.9 times (AOR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.44, 2.49) and 1.51 times (AOR = 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19, 1.92) more likely to face barriers, respectively. Married youths had a 1.22 times higher likelihood of facing barriers (AOR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.03, 1.44), and rural residents were three times more likely to experience challenges compared to urban residents (AOR = 3.00, 95% CI: 2.24, 4.01). Spatial analysis revealed regional disparities, with hotspots in Southern Manica and Northern Zambezia.

conclusionsFemale youths in Mozambique face significant barriers to healthcare access, mainly due to financial constraints and distance, with regional concentrations in Southern Manica, Southern Niassa, and Northern Zambezia. Key determinants include age, education, marital status, rural residency, and economic status. Targeted interventions should address these disparities by enhancing economic opportunities, promoting education, and improving transportation infrastructure. Policymakers must prioritize strategies to advance gender equity and health outcomes for female youths in Mozambique.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityAdolescentFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMozambiqueSocioeconomic FactorsSpatial AnalysisYoung AdultBarriers to healthcareFemale youthsHealthcare accessMozambique

Identifiers

PMID39915870
PMCPMC11804000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.