ArticleBiomedical engineering online2025
WDRIV-Net: a weighted ensemble transfer learning to improve automatic type stratification of lumbar intervertebral disc bulge, prolapse, and herniation.
Article in Biomedical engineering online, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The degeneration of the intervertebral discs in the lumbar spine is the common cause of neurological and physical dysfunctions and chronic disability of patients, which can be stratified into single-(e.g., disc herniation, prolapse, or bulge) and comorbidity-type degeneration (e.g., simultaneous presence of two or more conditions), respectively. A sample of lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images from multiple clinical hospitals in China was collected and used in the proposal assessment. We devised a weighted transfer learning framework WDRIV-Net by ensembling four pre-trained models including Densenet169, ResNet101, InceptionV3, and VGG19. The proposed approach was applied to the clinical data and achieved 96.25% accuracy, surpassing the benchmark ResNet101 (87.5%), DenseNet169 (82.5%), VGG19 (88.75%), InceptionV3 (93.75%), and other state-of-the-art (SOTA) ensemble deep learning models. Furthermore, improved performance was observed as well for the metric of the area under the curve (AUC), producing a ≥ 7% increase versus other SOTA ensemble learning, a ≥ 6% increase versus most-studied models, and a ≥ 2% increase versus the baselines. WDRIV-Net can serve as a guide in the initial and efficient type screening of complex degeneration of lumbar intervertebral discs (LID) and assist in the early-stage selection of clinically differentiated treatment options.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.