ArticleJournal of orthopaedic surgery and research2025
The reliability of talonavicular uncoverage to indicate forefoot abduction in progressive collapsing foot deformity: a finite element analysis.
Article in Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundProgressive Collapsing Foot Deformity (PCFD) presents various deformities. While medializing displacement calcaneal osteotomy (MDCO) and lateral column lengthening (LCL) are commonly employed as corrective surgeries, their impact on foot structure and functionality necessitates detailed biomechanical analysis. The objective of this study is to analyze the reliability of using talonavicular uncoverage percentage (TUP) as a metric for assessing the degree of forefoot abduction.
methodsSeven subject-specific flatfoot models were constructed based on previous study. Finite element analysis was conducted to simulate stress distribution and contact characteristics in PCFD. Models were categorized based on TUP values, and MDCO was performed to analyze stress changes in the medial longitudinal arch and contact characteristics of subtalar joint.
resultsThe study revealed discrepancies in TUP measurements between plain radiographs and three-dimensional models. Comparative analysis of the seven models showed that TUP exceeding 40% showed varied stress responses. A newly introduced parameter, the distance from the center of the head of the second metatarsal to the talar body axis (DSMT), demonstrated potential as a more dependable indicator. Models with DSMT below 20 mm experienced a remarkable reduction in ligamentous stress and notable change in region of stress concentration on the subtalar joint surface after MDCO, while those above 20 mm showed no noteworthy change.
conclusionThe study suggests that TUP may not be a reliable indicator for LCL surgery in PCFD, highlighting the need for improved assessment parameters. DSMT shows promise as a more dependable indicator, warranting further research to validate its efficacy. Enhanced indicators will facilitate better surgical planning in PCFD corrective procedures. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Accurate assessment of flatfoot deformities is crucial for developing effective treatments. DSMT , which utilizes the talar body axis as a reference, is not affected by anatomical variations in the talar head body angle, rendering it more reliable for assessment of forefoot abduc tion. Improved indicators will contribute to better surgical decision making and patient outcomes in PCFD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.