ArticleBMC medical education2025
Barriers faced by undergraduate dental students when conducting research: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CBCT in Dental Research: Is Complexity Necessary? An Exploratory Proof-of-Concept Study.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Perceptions of faculty and medical students regarding an undergraduate research culture activity in Myanmar: a qualitative study.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2025Article
- From Theory to Clinic: Exploring Dental Student Perspectives on Preventive Dentistry in Baghdad - a Qualitative Study.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Academic Experiences, Curriculum Perceptions, and Professional Readiness Among Dental Students in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResearch is an important part of dental education. While several quantitative studies have examined the barriers that undergraduate dental students face when conducting research, qualitative studies exploring the details and contexts of these barriers are rare. To bridge this gap, this research qualitatively explores the barriers faced by undergraduate dental students when conducting research.
methodsThe present qualitative study employs what is known as the "performative knowledge strategy." The 14 study participants were dental trainees included 10 undergraduate students and 4 interns who participated in research projects that were not part of their mandatory curriulum requirements. Diaries and semi-structured virtual (online) interviews were used to collect the data. Finally, using an inductive strategy, a thematic analytical approach was conducted to analyze the data.
resultsSix key themes emerged from the data analysis. The themes of "inadequate knowledge," "time constraints" and "lack of resources" confirm and align with the findings of previous studies, while the themes "misaligned schedules," "delayed response" and "lack of orientation" represent new insights into the barriers to research faced by undergraduate dental students.
conclusionThis study identified six factors that posed substantial barriers to research by undergraduate dental students. Analysis of these barriers can lead to the design and implementation of strategies to enhance and improve research experience. Additional qualitative research in this area would help to reveal further details of the barriers to research, while additional quantitative studies are required to assess the frequency and trends of the newly revealed barriers. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.