ArticleBMC medical education2025
International accreditation of a pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship program in Guatemala: a quantitative assessment.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Execution of a Pediatric Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship in Latin America.Journal of graduate medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeHigh-quality graduate medical education programs are essential to expand the care available to children with cancer worldwide. The authors used the Education Program Assessment Tool (EPAT), a standardized tool for evaluating pediatric hematology/oncology (PHO) fellowship programs, to describe the impact of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education International (ACGME-I) accreditation process.
methodsThe EPAT is a comprehensive, validated tool for evaluating the elements of PHO fellowship programs. The authors used the EPAT in May 2018 and December 2023 to compare the pre-accreditation and post-accreditation status of the Unidad Nacional de Oncología Pediátrica (UNOP) PHO fellowship program.
resultsThe authors used the EPAT to identify program gaps and to prioritize interventions to meet ACGME-I accreditation standards. Before accreditation, the overall score of the UNOP PHO fellowship program was 77.2%. The highest score was for Hospital Infrastructure (86.4%) and the lowest score was for Research (63.0%). After accreditation, the overall score was 88.3%. Eight of the 10 EPAT domains had higher post-accreditation scores, with a significant improvement in domain scores overall (P < 0.0001) (Fig. 2). In alignment with the improvement workstreams, the Educational Infrastructure and Evaluation domains had the greatest increases in scores (27% and 25%, respectively). Research continued to have the lowest score (75.9%), but this was improved by 13%.
conclusionsThis study provides quantitative data on the enhancement of a PHO fellowship program in a middle-income country after the process ACGME-I accreditation based on the improvement of EPAT scores. Additional analyses and evaluation tools are needed to identify strategies optimize training approaches and to meet the evolving accreditation standards for health care around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.