Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915690›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

Trichromacy is insufficient for mate detection in a mimetic butterfly.

Andrew Dang, Gary D Bernard, Furong Yuan, Aide Macias-Muñoz, Ryan I Hill, J P Lawrence, Aline Giselle Rangel Olguin, Armando Luis-Martínez, Sean P Mullen, Jorge Llorente-Bousquets and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Cellular innovations and diversity in the lepidopteran compound eye.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Andrew DangDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Gary D BernardDepartment of Electrical & Computer Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Furong YuanDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Aide Macias-MuñozDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Ryan I HillDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8513-6545
J P LawrenceDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Aline Giselle Rangel OlguinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA.
Armando Luis-MartínezMuseo de Zoología, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1044-3986
Sean P MullenDepartment of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.
Jorge Llorente-BousquetsMuseo de Zoología, Departamento de Biología Evolutiva, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de México, México.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-0533
Adriana D BriscoeDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, UC Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA. abriscoe@uci.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8514-4983

Funding

Human Frontier Science Program (HFSP) RGP005/2023National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-1342706National Science Foundation (NSF) DEB-1342759National Science Foundation (NSF) IOS-1656260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Color vision is thought to play a key role in the evolution of animal coloration, while achromatic vision is rarely considered as a mechanism for species recognition. Here we test the hypothesis that brightness vision rather than color vision helps Adelpha fessonia butterflies identify potential mates while their co-mimetic wing coloration is indiscriminable to avian predators. We examine the trichromatic visual system of A. fessonia and characterize its photoreceptors using RNA-seq, eyeshine, epi-microspectrophotometry, and optophysiology. We model the discriminability of its wing color patches in relation to those of its co-mimic, A. basiloides, through A. fessonia and avian eyes. Visual modeling suggests that neither A. fessonia nor avian predators can readily distinguish the co-mimics' coloration using chromatic or achromatic vision under natural conditions. These results suggest that mimetic colors are well-matched to visual systems to maintain mimicry, and that mate avoidance between these two look-alike species relies on other cues.

Indexed as

Biological MimicryButterfliesColor VisionPigmentationSexual Behavior, AnimalAnimalsColorFemaleMaleWings, Animal

Identifiers

PMID39915690
PMCPMC11802900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.