ArticleNpj mental health research2025
Decoding substance use disorder severity from clinical notes using a large language model.
Article in Npj mental health research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Opportunities and risks of large language models in digital interventions for substance use disorders.Current opinion in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Computable Structured Phenotype Versus Large Language Model Identification of Opioid Use Disorder Using Electronic Health Record Data.Annals of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Feasibility and user evaluation of HopeBot: An LLM-powered conversational chatbot for depression screening.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Large Language Models and Their Applications in Mental Health: Scoping Review.JMIR mental health · 2026Article
- Comparing computable structured phenotype- versus large language model-identification of opioid use disorder using electronic health record data.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026Article
- Enhancing substance use detection in clinical notes with large language models.Drug and alcohol dependence · 2025Article
- Systematic Evaluation of Auto-Encoding and Large Language Model Representations for Capturing Author States and Traits.Findings of ACL. ACL · 2025Article
- Enhancing Substance Use Detection in Clinical Notes with Large Language Models.Research square · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Substance use disorder (SUD) poses a major concern due to its detrimental effects on health and society. SUD identification and treatment depend on a variety of factors such as severity, co-determinants (e.g., withdrawal symptoms), and social determinants of health. Existing diagnostic coding systems used by insurance providers, like the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10), lack granularity for certain diagnoses, but American clinicians will add this granularity (as that found within the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classification or DSM-5) as supplemental unstructured text in clinical notes. Traditional natural language processing (NLP) methods face limitations in accurately parsing such diverse clinical language. Large language models (LLMs) offer promise in overcoming these challenges by adapting to diverse language patterns. This study investigates the application of LLMs for extracting severity-related information for various SUD diagnoses from clinical notes. We propose a workflow employing zero-shot learning of LLMs with carefully crafted prompts and post-processing techniques. Through experimentation with Flan-T5, an open-source LLM, we demonstrate its superior recall compared to the rule-based approach. Focusing on 11 categories of SUD diagnoses, we show the effectiveness of LLMs in extracting severity information, contributing to improved risk assessment and treatment planning for SUD patients.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.