ArticleCommunications medicine2025
Swarm learning with weak supervision enables automatic breast cancer detection in magnetic resonance imaging.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Privacy-Preserving Surgical Video Analysis with Swarm Learning - Results from a Multinational Appendectomy Cohort.NEJM AI · 2026Article
- Decentralized, privacy-preserving surgical video analysis with Swarm Learning.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Author response to ZhangJournal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOver the next 5 years, new breast cancer screening guidelines recommending magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for certain patients will significantly increase the volume of imaging data to be analyzed. While this increase poses challenges for radiologists, artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential solutions to manage this workload. However, the development of AI models is often hindered by manual annotation requirements and strict data-sharing regulations between institutions.
methodsIn this study, we present an integrated pipeline combining weakly supervised learning-reducing the need for detailed annotations-with local AI model training via swarm learning (SL), which circumvents centralized data sharing. We utilized three datasets comprising 1372 female bilateral breast MRI exams from institutions in three countries: the United States (US), Switzerland, and the United Kingdom (UK) to train models. These models were then validated on two external datasets consisting of 649 bilateral breast MRI exams from Germany and Greece.
resultsUpon systematically benchmarking various weakly supervised two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning (DL) methods, we find that the 3D-ResNet-101 demonstrates superior performance. By implementing a real-world SL setup across three international centers, we observe that these collaboratively trained models outperform those trained locally. Even with a smaller dataset, we demonstrate the practical feasibility of deploying SL internationally with on-site data processing, addressing challenges such as data privacy and annotation variability.
conclusionsCombining weakly supervised learning with SL enhances inter-institutional collaboration, improving the utility of distributed datasets for medical AI training without requiring detailed annotations or centralized data sharing.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.