Observational studyScientific reports2025
Clinical and measurement variables affecting halitosis intensity following cysteine challenge test.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Dietary Sulfur Compounds and Halitosis: Bridging Food Science, Microbial Metabolism, and Oral Health: A Comprehensive Review.Molecular nutrition & food research · 2026Review
- The Effect ofDentistry journal · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The cysteine challenge test is a reliable and efficient method for halitosis diagnosis and assessing treatment effectiveness by measuring the capacity to produce hydrogen sulfide. However, several aspects related to the test including evaluation timing and total duration following cysteine loading has not been investigated in-depth and a standardized protocol is yet to be established. This observational study compared concentrations of volatile sulfur compounds (VSCs) following cysteine challenge at various time points based on different measurement tools to investigate clinical factors influencing the results. Cysteine challenge (rinsing for 30 s with 5 mL of 6 mM L-cysteine solution) was applied in 100 healthy subjects. VSC concentration of oral cavity gas was analyzed with standard and portable gas chromatography (GC) at 5 time points (before, immediately, 10, 20, and 30 min after cysteine challenge). The Community Periodontal Index of Treatment Needs (CPITN), Winkel's Tongue Coating Index, and salivary flow rate were assessed. VSC levels significantly increased immediately after cysteine challenge (p < 0.001 for hydrogen sulfide, p < 0.001 with standard GC and p < 0.05 with portable GC for methyl mercaptan). Levels significantly decreased at 10 min after cysteine challenge except for methyl mercaptan measured with standard GC (p < 0.001). Subjects still showing VSCs 20 min after cysteine challenge was less than 15% of those initially positive. The amount of tongue coating showed significant association with methyl mercaptan levels immediately after (β = 0.202, p = 0.049) and 10 min following (β = 0.207, p = 0.045) cysteine challenge and CPITN showed acceptable discriminative power for persistent detection of methyl mercaptan (cut-off = 1.5, AUC = 0.668). Cysteine challenge may enhance the possibility of detecting VSCs during halitosis diagnosis. Standardized test protocols should address measurement timing, tools used, and tongue coating levels as clinical factors influencing VSC detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.