Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915513›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

A knowledge graph for crop diseases and pests in China.

Rongen Yan, Ping An, Xianghao Meng, Yakun Li, Dongmei Li, Fu Xu, Depeng Dang

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rongen YanSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5107-4339
Ping AnSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Xianghao MengSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Yakun LiSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China.
Dongmei LiSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. lidongmei@bjfu.edu.cn.
Fu XuSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, 100083, China. xufu@bjfu.edu.cn.
Depeng DangSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A standardized representation and sharing of crop disease and pest data is crucial for enhancing crop yields, especially in China, which features vast cultivation areas and complex agricultural ecosystems. A knowledge graph for crop diseases and pests, acting as a repository of entities and relationships, is crucial conceptually for achieving unified data management. However, there is currently a lack of knowledge graphs specifically designed for this field. In this paper, we propose CropDP-KG, a knowledge graph for crop diseases and pests in China, which leverages natural language processing techniques to analyze data from the Chinese crop diseases and pests image-text database. CropDP-KG covers relevant information on crop diseases and pests in China, featuring 8 primary entities such as diseases, symptoms, and crops, and is organized into 7 relationships such as primary occurrence locations, affected parts and suitable temperature. In total, it includes 13,840 entities and 21,961 relationships. In the case studies presented in this research, we also show a versatile application of CropDP, namely a knowledge service system, and have released its codebase under an open-source license. The content of this paper provides a guide for users to build their own knowledge graphs, aiming to help them effectively reuse and extend the knowledge graphs they create.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalPlant DiseasesChinaDatabases, FactualNatural Language Processing

Identifiers

PMID39915513
PMCPMC11802884

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.