ArticleNature communications2025
How energy determines spatial localisation and copy number of molecules in neurons.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetic Control of Nuclear-encoded Mitochondrial mRNA Localization and Local Translation.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Axonopathy: mechanisms and potential therapeutic targets for neurodegenerative diseases.Translational neurodegeneration · 2026Review
- Multiplexed smFISH Reveals the Spatial Organization of Neuropil Localized mRNAs Is Linked to Abundance.eNeuro · 2025Article
- Activity drives local CaMKII synthesis and subcellular localization via autophosphorylation-dependent pathways.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- The Proteostasis Network in Proteinopathies: Mechanisms and Interconnections.The American journal of pathology · 2025Review
- Synaptic transmission in supragranular layers of the human cortex - comparative review of structure, function, and plasticity.Frontiers in synaptic neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In neurons, the quantities of mRNAs and proteins are traditionally assumed to be determined by functional, electrical or genetic factors. Yet, there may also be global, currently unknown computational rules that are valid across different molecular species inside a cell. Surprisingly, our results show that the energy for molecular turnover is a significant cellular expense, en par with spiking cost, and which requires energy-saving strategies. We show that the drive to save energy determines transcript quantities and their location while acting differently on each molecular species depending on the length, longevity and other features of the respective molecule. We combined our own data and experimental reports from five other large-scale mRNA and proteomics screens, comprising more than ten thousand molecular species to reveal the underlying computational principles of molecular localisation. We found that energy minimisation principles explain experimentally-reported exponential rank distributions of mRNA and protein copy numbers. Our results further reveal robust energy benefits when certain mRNA classes are moved into dendrites, for example mRNAs of proteins with long amino acid chains or mRNAs with large non-coding regions and long half-lives proving surprising insights at the level of molecular populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.