ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2025
Economic Evaluation of Transitioning to the 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine in the Dutch Paediatric National Immunisation Programme.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimating clinical and economic impacts and cost-effectiveness of introducing 20-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine in Taiwan's pediatric National Immunization Program and impacts of a delayed implementation.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of the Switch to 20-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine from Lower-Valent Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccines in the French Pediatric Population.Infectious diseases and therapy · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIn 2024, the vaccination strategy against pneumococcal disease in the Dutch paediatric population was changed from the 10-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV) (PCV10) to a 15-valent PCV (PCV15) under a 2 + 1 schedule. We aimed to assess whether switching from PCV15 under a 2 + 1 schedule to 20-valent PCV (PCV20) under a 3 + 1 schedule in the Dutch paediatric national immunisation programme (NIP) would yield economic savings and health benefits.
methodsA multiple-cohort population model with an annual cycle and 10-year time horizon was adapted for the Dutch population from a societal perspective. Discounting was set at 3.0% and 1.5% for costs and benefits, respectively. Medical and societal costs were calculated, along with cases of invasive and non-invasive pneumococcal disease, and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) for PCV15 and PCV20, from which, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per QALY was calculated for PCV20 versus PCV15 to determine the economic benefits of PCV20. The model assumptions were tested in probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses, as well as a series of scenario analyses.
resultsBoth medical and societal cost of disease were substantially lower with PCV20 versus PCV15 (incremental cost-savings of €130,113,010 and €61,593,168, respectively), with total incremental cost-savings of €29,365,696 when considering the cost of the vaccination programme. With an overall QALY gain of 33,232, the ICER per QALY placed PCV20 as the dominant strategy, as it was both more effective and less costly than PCV15. PCV20 was estimated to result in 57,657 fewer pneumococcal disease cases across invasive and non-invasive disease and 1561 fewer disease-related deaths. The sensitivity and scenario analyses demonstrated the robustness of the model results.
conclusionThis cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrated that switching from PCV15 2 + 1 to PCV20 3 + 1 in the Dutch paediatric NIP would reduce both the clinical burden and projected costs of pneumococcal disease over 10 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.