ArticleCJEM2025
Ultrasound in pediatric emergency medicine simulation: evaluation of a longitudinal curriculum.
Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- POCUS in pediatric arrest (Res-US pulse check): development and evaluation of a simulation-based curriculum.Resuscitation plus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesPediatric resuscitations involving shock and trauma are rare but they are high-stakes events in the pediatric emergency department (ED). Effective use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) can expedite diagnosis and treatment in such cases. This study aimed to assess the impact of a longitudinal pediatric emergency medicine simulation curriculum and high-fidelity POCUS simulator on residents' clinical practice, comfort level, and motivation to learn resuscitative ultrasound.
methodsThis mixed-methods study involved 12 pediatric emergency medicine residents who participated in a 12-month simulation curriculum integrating resuscitative ultrasound. The POCUS simulator was integrated and made available for use during all simulations. Assessment and program evaluation occurred at multiple levels, according to Kirkpatrick's hierarchy, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. The residents were surveyed at baseline, 4, 8 and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted at the end of the 12-month study period.
resultsTwelve residents participated in 23 simulation cases over the 12-month longitudinal curriculum. The hybrid POCUS simulator was used by participants in 18/23 (78.2%) cases. Comparing pre- and post-curriculum changes, large effect sizes were seen in residents' comfort using ultrasound in resuscitation (including in cases of trauma and undifferentiated shock). Accordingly, the mean number of POCUS scans performed per resident clinically on shift increased from a mean (SD) of 5.7 (± 2.3) scans/month to 12.4 (± 5.1) scans/month. Qualitative analysis highlighted several themes, including the value of simulation for teaching the integration of resuscitative ultrasound in high-acuity low-occurrence events and the effect of repeat exposures to resuscitative ultrasound.
conclusionOur study demonstrated that a longitudinal, simulation-based curriculum focused on resuscitative ultrasound increased residents' confidence, their motivation and likelihood of using these skills in the clinical setting. Repeated simulation exposures to resuscitative ultrasound can help participants translate this critical skill into use at the bedside, especially in high-acuity low-occurrence events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39915435What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.