ArticleStrahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al]2026
Assessment of needle bending and tracking requirements for optimized needle placement in combined intracavitary/interstitial gynecologic brachytherapy.
Article in Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Approaches to needle navigation in interstitial brachytherapy using infrared tracking and radiography.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeNeedle tracking using external prediction techniques such as optical tracking is a modern approach aimed at improving implantation accuracy in gynecologic brachytherapy. This study aims to investigate the corresponding impact of needle bending in situ and to analyze needle path deviations from the intended locations occurring in our current clinical workflow that only considers ultrasound imaging without tracking.
methodsWe developed a semi-automated approach for reconstructing brachytherapy needles based on planning CTs and compared the respective accuracy to the also determined intra-observer variability of manual reconstructions. Based on this, we measured needle bending in situ for 89 patients and calculated the Euclidean distances between actual needle tips and needle tip predictions both longitudinally and laterally to the insertion direction. Furthermore, we compared actual and intended spacings between inserted needles to estimate implantation uncertainties with respect to our current clinical workflow.
resultsOur developed reconstruction featured an accuracy of 0.17 ± 0.08 mm, which was improved compared to the intra-observer variability of 0.21 ± 0.11 mm. Needle bending depended strongly on needle length and ranged from 3.6 ± 2.1 mm for 100-120 mm needles up to 7.9 ± 3.0 mm for 200-220 mm needles. Deflections in the transverse direction were substantially higher than tip deviations in the longitudinal direction. Furthermore, we found deviations from an equidistant spacing between needle paths of 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in the transverse direction.
conclusionInserting brachytherapy needles can be substantially affected by transverse needle bending in situ, which should therefore be corrected for in prediction approaches such as optical tracking.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.