ArticleBMJ health & care informatics2025
Evaluating the implementation of a digital coordination centre in an Australian hospital setting: a mixed method study protocol.
Article in BMJ health & care informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Implementation of a digital coordination centre in a hospital: a qualitative evaluation of enablers, barriers and strategies.BMC health services research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThis protocol outlines a mixed methods study evaluating a new Digital Coordination Centre (DCC) at the Royal Melbourne Hospital (RMH), Melbourne, Australia. While coordination centres show potential for impact, evidence on effective implementation in the Australian context remains scarce. This study aims to address this gap. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The evaluation involves a two-stage approach: a process evaluation to clarify DCC design and identify implementation factors, and an initial outcome evaluation to assess short and medium term outcomes. A developmental approach will support continuous improvement, and implementation science theories applied to unpack change processes. Data sources will include interviews, project documentation and observations, with qualitative and quantitative analyses targeting metrics like emergency department boarding and length of stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the RMH Human Research Ethics Committee (QA2023089). Findings will be shared through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.