ArticleHeart (British Cardiac Society)2025
Dysglycaemia and incident aortic stenosis: a cohort study.
Article in Heart (British Cardiac Society), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Type 2 diabetes is associated with clinical progression of aortic stenosis: a nationwide retrospective study in Sweden.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Shared pathophysiological mechanisms between diabetes and calcific aortic valve disease: an immunometabolic perspective.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- Valvular Heart Diseases in Swedish Males and Females: A National Cohort Study.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Association between cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and glucose index and risks of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in patients with calcific aortic valve stenosis: the ARISTOTLE cohort study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Observational
- Dysglycaemia is associated with the pattern of valvular calcification in micro-computed tomography analysis: an observational study in patients with severe aortic stenosis.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAortic stenosis is a degenerative condition with high mortality in its severe stages and no preventive treatment. While diabetes is a known risk factor, the role of elevated glucose levels below the diabetic threshold in the development of aortic stenosis remains unclear. This study investigated the association between dysglycaemia, including impaired fasting glucose, and the incidence of aortic stenosis.
methodsThis study included 324 449 participants from the Swedish Apolipoprotein Mortality Risk cohort (1985-1996) who were free of aortic valve disease at baseline and had fasting glucose and lipid levels recorded. Participants were followed for incident aortic stenosis through the National Patient and Cause of Death Registers until 31 December 2020. Fasting glucose was categorised into low (<3.9 mmol/L), normal (3.9-6.0 mmol/L), impaired fasting glucose (6.1-6.9 mmol/L), high glucose (≥7.0 mmol/L) and diabetes. HRs were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models, with adjustments for age, sex, lipids, socioeconomic status, hypertension and kidney disease.
resultsOver a mean follow-up of 25.9 years, 8523 participants developed aortic stenosis. Compared with normal glucose levels, adjusted HRs were 0.96 (95% CI 0.82 to 1.13) for low glucose, 1.36 (95% CI 1.24 to 1.50) for impaired fasting glucose, 1.79 (95% CI 1.60 to 1.99) for high glucose and 2.21 (95% CI 1.80 to 2.73) for diabetes. Spline analysis indicated a continuous increase in risk with rising glucose levels, even below the impaired fasting glucose threshold.
conclusionsDysglycaemia, including glucose levels below the diabetic range, is associated with a higher risk of aortic stenosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.