Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39915027›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Structured lactation support for mothers of very low birthweight preterm infants and establishment of human donor milk banks in German NICUs (Neo-MILK): protocol for a hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomised controlled trial.

Nicola Gabriela Dymek, Julia Jaschke, Anna Katharina Stirner, Isabella Schwab, Tim Ohnhäuser, Daniel Wiesen, Till Dresbach, Nadine Scholten, Juliane Köberlein-Neu, Neo-MILK Consortium

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Nicola Gabriela DymekCentre for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany dymek@wiwi.uni-wuppertal.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-3594-2617
Julia JaschkeCentre for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.
Anna Katharina StirnerDepartment of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Isabella SchwabDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany.
Tim OhnhäuserDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany.
Daniel WiesenDepartment of Business Administration and Health Care Management, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Till DresbachNeonatology, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Nadine ScholtenDepartment of Health Services Research, University of Cologne, Koln, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7793-7745
Juliane Köberlein-NeuCentre for Health Economics and Health Services Research, University of Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3451-7847
Neo-MILK Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHuman milk, especially mother's own milk (MOM), is vital for newborns and crucial for very low birthweight (VLBW, <1500 g) preterm infants, who face increased vulnerability. As the production of MOM may be impeded due to preterm birth, it is important to provide lactation support and establish human donor milk (HDM) banks to provide HDM when MOM is fully or initially absent. This protocol describes the design of a study evaluating the effectiveness, implementation and economic aspects of an intervention, which aims to ensure access to MOM or HDM for VLBW infants from the first day of life in German neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation cluster-randomised controlled trial, using a stepped-wedge design, will be conducted in 15 level I and level II NICUs across Germany over 26 months. VLBW infants and their mothers will receive either standard care or the Neo-MILK intervention according to the NICU's group status. The primary outcome is the proportion of VLBW infants exclusively fed with MOM at NICU discharge. Secondary outcomes at infant level include feeding patterns, complications, length of stay and frequency of feeding with HDM. Maternal-level secondary outcomes cover lactation/breastfeeding decision and behaviour. A process evaluation and an economic analysis will accompany the study. The data set comprises survey and interview data and routinely collected data from medical records. Statistical analysis will be performed using generalised linear mixed models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Data collection, storage and analysis comply with current data protection regulations. This study has received ethical approval from the Ethics Committee of the Medical Faculty of the University of Cologne and the local ethics committees of the participating NICUs. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and on the project website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00025058.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingInfant, Very Low Birth WeightIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLactationMilk BanksMilk, HumanFemaleGermanyHumansInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMothersRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicResearch DesignHEALTH ECONOMICSHealth ServicesNEONATOLOGYRandomized Controlled Trial

Identifiers

PMID39915027
PMCPMC11800210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.