ArticleBMJ open2025
The REpeated ASSEssment of SurvivorS in intracerebral haemorrhage: protocol for a multicentre, prospective observational study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05611918 (The Repeated Assessment of Survivors in ICH), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Repeated Assessment of Survivors in ICH (REASSESS ICH)
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Extension of the FUNC Score for Prediction of 12-Month Functional Independence after Primary Intracerebral Hemorrhage.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe REpeated ASSEssment of SurvivorS (REASSESS) study will conduct long-term cognitive, functional and neuropsychiatric performance assessments to determine whether evacuation of spontaneous intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) reduces the risk of later cognitive decline in the ageing brain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study will compare rates of cognitive decline under two treatment strategies for ICH. The first strategy is the use of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with similar techniques as performed in (1) the Minimally Invasive Surgery plus rt-PA in the Treatment of Intracerebral haemorrhage Evacuation phase III (MISTIE III) trial, (2) the Early MiNimally-invasive Removal of IntraCerebral Haemorrhage (ENRICH) trial and (3) a single-centre cohort of consecutively treated patients with MIS. The second strategy is the current non-surgical standard of care using data from controls in MISTIE III and ENRICH and comparative data from The Ethnic/Racial Variations of ICH (ERICH) studyextended into the ERICH-Longitudinal study, which followed over 900 of ERICH cases with serial cognitive examinations. If successful, the REASSESS study could demonstrate that reduction of ICH volume is a critical target to reduce the risk of progressive cognitive decline, establish targets for residual haematoma volume reduction and determine if greater residual haematoma volume leads to a long-term inflammatory state. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval of this study was obtained from the Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board (IRB00311985). The findings of the study will be published in academic peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05611918; ClinicalTrials.gov; registered on 23 May 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.