Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39914827›Full record

ArticleAnatomy & cell biology2025

Hip joint and age relationship in Thai population by image processing technique.

Supachard Krudtong, Nipon Theera-Umpon, Parkpoom Jarupoom, Sukon Prasitwattanaseree, Apichat Sinthubua, Pasuk Mahakkanukrauh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomy & cell biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Supachard KrudtongBiomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2161-295X
Nipon Theera-UmponBiomedical Engineering Institute, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2951-9610
Parkpoom JarupoomDepartment of Industrial Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Rajamangala University of Technology Lanna, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-4900
Sukon PrasitwattanasereeDepartment of Statistics, Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1987-773X
Apichat SinthubuaDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5349-4214
Pasuk MahakkanukrauhDepartment of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0611-7552

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone age is a critical factor in personal identification, with the hip joint-encompassing the acetabulum and femoral head-commonly used in age estimation. Age assessments rely on factors such as bone porosity and morphological characteristics. These are currently conducted by experts and their conclusions can vary. The logistical challenge of transporting physical bones complicates the process. The increasing use of image processing techniques in the medical field provides a more efficient and convenient alternative. This study used image processing methods to analyze area ratios and percent porosity of the acetabulum and femoral head, with a statistical evaluation of the relationship between these parameters and age at a 90% confidence level (α=0.10). The dataset comprised images from 167 skeletons including 59 females aged 30 to 88 and 108 males aged 28 to 97. The analysis revealed a significant relationship between percent porosity and age in males, both in the acetabulum and femoral head, with

Indexed as

AcetabulumAnalysis of varianceFemur headPorosity

Identifiers

PMID39914827
PMCPMC11933803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.