ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Organ Donation Conversations on X and Development of the OrgReach Social Media Marketing Strategy: Social Network Analysis.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe digital landscape has become a vital platform for public health discourse, particularly concerning important topics like organ donation. With a global rise in organ transplant needs, fostering public understanding and positive attitudes toward organ donation is critical. Social media platforms, such as X, contain conversations from the public, and key stakeholders maintain an active presence on the platform.
objectiveThe goal is to develop insights into organ donation discussions on a popular social media platform (X) and understand the context in which users discussed organ donation advocacy. We investigate the influence of prominent profiles on X and meta-level accounts, including those seeking health information. We use credibility theory to explore the construction and impact of credibility within social media contexts in organ donation discussions.
methodsData were retrieved from X between October 2023 and May 2024, covering a 7-month period. The study was able to retrieve a dataset with 20,124 unique users and 33,830 posts. The posts were analyzed using social network analysis and qualitative thematic analysis. NodeXL Pro was used to retrieve and analyze the data, and a network visualization was created by drawing upon the Clauset-Newman-Moore cluster algorithm and the Harel-Koren Fast Multiscale layout algorithm.
resultsThis analysis reveals an "elite tier" shaping the conversation, with themes reflecting existing societal sensitivities around organ donation. We demonstrate how prominent social media profiles act as information intermediaries, navigating the tension between open dialogue and negative perceptions. We use our findings, social credibility theory, and review of existing literature to develop the OrgReach Social Media Marketing Strategy for Organ Donation Awareness. The OrgReach strategy developed is based on 5 C's (Create, Connect, Collaborate, Correct, and Curate), 2 A's (Access and Analyse), and 3 R's (Recognize, Respond, and Reevaluate).
conclusionsThe study highlights the crucial role of analyzing social media data by drawing upon social networks and topic analysis to understand influence and network communication patterns. By doing so, the study proposes the OrgReach strategy that can feed into the marketing strategies for organ donation outreach and awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.