Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39914280›Full record

ArticleHearing research2025

Musically evoked emotions in cochlear implant users and those with no known hearing loss.

Samantha R O'Connell, Julianne M Papadopoulos, Daniel Inouye, Brandon J van der Donk, Helena Gan, Raymond L Goldsworthy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Samantha R O'ConnellKeck School of Medicine of USC,The Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033. Electronic address: samroconnell@gmail.com.
Julianne M PapadopoulosKeck School of Medicine of USC,The Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033. Electronic address: jmpapado@usc.edu.
Daniel InouyeKeck School of Medicine of USC,The Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033.
Brandon J van der DonkKeck School of Medicine of USC,The Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033. Electronic address: bvanderd@usc.edu.
Helena GanKeck School of Medicine of USC,The Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033. Electronic address: hgan@alumni.usc.edu.
Raymond L GoldsworthyKeck School of Medicine of USC,The Caruso Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90033. Electronic address: raymond.goldsworthy@med.usc.edu.

Funding

Music Appreciation after Cochlear ImplantationR01DC018701 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI GOLDSWORTHY, RAYMOND L · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018701
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCochlear implants provide the profoundly deaf excellent speech comprehension; however, perception and appreciation of music remains a challenge. Previous work suggests that cochlear implant users, compared to normal-hearing listeners, have diminished perception of certain musically evoked emotions due to deficits in hearing pitch-related musical elements. The purpose of this study was to investigate how well cochlear implants users use pitch-based information to identify the emotional intent of music.

methodsTwenty-six cochlear implant users and 24 peers with no known hearing loss completed a set of online auditory measures. Participants were asked to rate the valence and arousal of 10 happy, 10 sad, 10 scary, and 10 peaceful melodies as categorized by Vieillard et al. (2008). Melodies that were previously categorized as peaceful and sad were then altered from major to minor modes (peaceful to peaceful-modified) and from minor to major (sad to sad-modified), respectively. Additionally, the tempo of these melodies was controlled at 60 beats per minute. Participants then valence and arousal of these 10 sad, 10 sad-modified, 10 peaceful, and 10 peaceful-modified melodies. Participants completed a series pitch perception tasks including major and minor melody and arpeggio discrimination and melodic contour identification. During data analysis, correlations between valence and arousal ratings, major and minor melody and arpeggio discrimination scores, and melodic contour identification scores were assessed.

resultsWhen listening to the unmodified melodies from Viellaird et al. (2008), both cochlear implant users and those with no known hearing loss rated happy melodies more distinctly in valence and arousal than sad, peaceful, and scary melodies. Cochlear implant users rated the valence of sad and peaceful melodies more similarly compared to those with no known hearing loss. When listening to the modified melodies, cochlear implant users rated original and modified sad and peaceful melodies similarly on the dimensions of valence and arousal. This contrasts with results found in those with no known hearing loss who utilized mode changes to rate melodies in major modes higher in valence than melodies in minor modes. For major and minor melody and arpeggio discrimination, those with no known hearing loss performed close to or at ceiling while cochlear implant users mostly performed in the chance range. Finally, for melodic contour identification, many cochlear implant users performed significantly worse than those with no known hearing loss.

conclusionThis study further reveals the challenges that cochlear implant patients face in using modal cues to perceive the emotional intent of music. While cochlear implant users are able to utilize tempo cues to derive the emotional intent of melodies to an extent, they struggle once these cues are taken away. Therefore, the data presented here provides a foundation upon which to explore how pitch-based training may improve cochlear implant users' perception of musical mode. Given the ubiquity of using mode to communicate musical emotional intent, pitch-based training may in turn lead to enhanced music appreciation among cochlear implant users.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsDeafnessEmotionsHearing LossMusicPersons with Hearing DisabilitiesAcoustic StimulationAdultAgedArousalCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedCochlear implantsEmotionMusicTonality

Identifiers

PMID39914280
PMCPMC12341844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.