Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39914192›Full record

Trial reportDrug and alcohol dependence2025

Effects of very low nicotine cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and nicotine patches on daily own-cigarette abstinence in a randomized controlled switching trial.

Thomas M Piasecki, Wendy S Slutske, Daniel M Bolt, Douglas E Jorenby, Megan E Piper

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Thomas M PiaseckiDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA. Electronic address: tpiasecki@ctri.wisc.edu.
Wendy S SlutskeCenter for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Daniel M BoltDepartment of Educational Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Douglas E JorenbyDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.
Megan E PiperDepartment of Medicine, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA; Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Funding

Understanding the real-world impact of the use of three alternate nicotine-delivery products on combustible cigarette useR01CA239309 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI PIPER, MEGAN E · 2019 to 2021
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA239309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThis research investigated the extent to which three nicotine products promote day-level cigarette substitution during a 1-week switch attempt

methodsAdults who smoked daily but were not motivated to quit were randomized to 4 weeks using: 1) very low nicotine cigarettes (VLNCs), 2) e-cigarettes, or 3) no product. During two separate switch weeks, participants were instructed to abstain from their own cigarettes and switch to using their study product (if assigned one). Participants were also assigned to use active nicotine patches during one switch week and placebo patches during the other. Nightly smartphone surveys assessed use of participants' own-brand cigarettes. Average marginal effects from a logistic regression model characterized effects of trial design variables on day-level own-cigarette abstinence.

resultsParticipants (N = 196) recorded 4998 evening reports. Switch weeks were associated with an average marginal increase in abstinence rate by 27.9 percentage points (p < .001). The switch week effect was significantly larger in the VLNC (35.9 percentage points), and e-cigarette (31.2) groups compared to the no product group (16.4; ps < .05). Use of active patches during the first switch week increased abstinence by 6.9 percentage points on average (p = .010), but use of active patches during the second switch week decreased abstinence probability by 9.6 percentage points (p = .032, difference p = .010)

conclusionsVLNCs and e-cigarettes meaningfully and equivalently increase the probability of day-level abstinence from one's own cigarettes. Transdermal nicotine promotes cigarette substitution, but only when provided early in the switching process.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingElectronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsNicotineSmoking CessationTobacco ProductsTobacco Use Cessation DevicesAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultNicotineCigarette substitutionElectronic cigarettesNicotine patchTobacco harm reductionTobacco.Regulatory ScienceVery low nicotine cigarettes

Identifiers

PMID39914192
PMCPMC11837730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.