ArticleCBE life sciences education2025
Self-Testing and Follow-Through of Learning Strategies Supports Student Success.
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Studying with Friends in Introductory Biology Is Associated with Low Impact Study Strategies and No Improvement of Exam Scores.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Resource Use in Introductory Biology: Evaluating Latent Patterns, Demographic Covariates, and Effects on Final Course Grade.CBE life sciences education · 2026Article
- Readiness for self-directed learning among first-year medical and nursing students at the Arabian Gulf University in Bahrain.BMC medical education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence abounds that passive strategies such as rereading or highlighting are less effective than active strategies such as drawing models or explaining concepts to others. However, many studies have also reported that students tend to use learning strategies that they perceive as comfortable and easy, even when other strategies may be more successful. In this study, we asked students to self-report their study strategies after test-taking, as well as any planned new strategies. We also compared their self-reports with their actual use of the technique of self-testing, which was defined as completing practice problems in their online courseware system. In contrast to prior studies, students reported using self-testing more than any other strategy, and the amount of self-testing they used predicted their final performance in the course. Students' continued reporting of intended new strategies also correlated with performance, as did the accuracy of their reports of self-testing. These findings demonstrate that the amount of self-testing affects performance, and that students' accurate reporting of self-testing could be an indicator of their awareness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.