Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913549›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2025

Impact of Chinese criteria on potentially inappropriate medication use in China.

Fangyuan Tian, Zhaoyan Chen, Ying Zhang, Qiyi Feng, Xi Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fangyuan TianDepartment of Pharmacy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Zhaoyan ChenDepartment of Pharmacy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Ying ZhangDepartment of Pharmacy, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Qiyi FengPrecision Medicine Research Center, Sichuan Provincial Key Laboratory of Precision Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Geriatrics, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Xi ChenDepartment of Integrated Care Management Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2018, China issued a set of criteria for effectively identifying and managing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use in older adults. However, there is currently a lack of evidence regarding the impact of these criteria on PIM use among older Chinese adults. Methods: We used interrupted time series analysis on the prescription data of older outpatients from 59 hospitals in six major geographic regions of China to compare changes in the overall prevalence of PIM use, the prevalence of PIM use stratified by different numbers of PIMs, and the prevalence of top five PIMs (i.e. clopidogrel, estazolam, zolpidem, sliding-scale insulin, and alprazolam) from 2015 (before) to 2021 (after) the release of criteria in 2018. Results: We included 982 605 older outpatients. Compared with trends prior to the publication of the criteria, there were significant decreases in the coefficient for change in the slope of the overall prevalence of PIM use (β = -0.607; 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.881, -0.482; P < 0.001), the prevalence of single PIM use (β = -0.368; 95% CI = -0.465, -0.272; P < 0.001), the prevalence of multiple PIM use (β = -0.104; 95% CI = -0.173, -0.080; P = 0.019), the prevalence of clopidogrel (β = -0.342; 95% CI = -0.463, -0.227; P = 0.006), and the prevalence of estazolam (β = -0.077; 95% CI = -0.124, -0.037; P = 0.009) post-publication. Conversely, there was a significant increase in the prevalence of zolpidem, after the criteria were released (β = 0.030; 95% CI = 0.002, 0.057; P = 0.036). Conclusions: We found that the release of criteria for effectively identifying and managing PIM use has had a positive effect on its prevalence among older outpatients in China.

Indexed as

Inappropriate PrescribingPotentially Inappropriate Medication ListAgedAged, 80 and overChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansInterrupted Time Series AnalysisMalePrevalence

Identifiers

PMID39913549
PMCPMC11801653

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.