ArticleJournal of global health2025
Factors associated with underweight, overweight, and obesity in Chinese children aged 3-14 years using ensemble learning algorithms.
Article in Journal of global health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Applications of artificial intelligence in early childhood health management: a systematic review from fetal to pediatric periods.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Pooled it
- Development and external validation of an interpretable machine learning-based model for obesity risk prediction in 2-18-year-old children and adolescents in Beijing and Tangshan.Journal of global health · 2026Article
- Physical Activity Determinants Under the Double Burden of Malnutrition: Contrasting Pathways for Underweight and Overweight Chinese Adolescents.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Development and validation of an explainable machine learning-based risk prediction model for obesity in Chinese children and adolescents: a population-based study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Bridging the gap in obesity research: A consensus statement from the European Society for Clinical Investigation.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Factors underlying the development of childhood underweight, overweight, and obesity are not fully understood. Traditional models have drawbacks in handling large-scale, high-dimensional, and nonlinear data. In this study, we aimed to identify factors responsible for underweight, overweight, and obesity using machine learning methods among Chinese children. Methods: Our study participants were children aged 3-14 from 30 kindergartens and 26 schools in Beijing and Tangshan. Weight status was defined per the World Health Organization criteria. We implemented three ensemble learning algorithms and compared their performance and ranked the contributing factors by importance and identified an optimal set. A user-friendly web application was developed to calculate the predicted probability of childhood underweight, overweight, and obesity. Results: We analysed data from 18 503 children aged 3-14, including 1798 underweight, 10 579 of normal weight, 3257 overweight, and 2869 with obesity. Of all algorithms, random forest performed the best, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic reaching 0.759 for underweight, 0.806 for overweight, and 0.849 for obesity, with other metrics also reinforcing this algorithm. Further cumulative analyses showed that, for underweight, the optimal set of six factors included maternal body mass index (BMI), age, paternal BMI, maternal reproductive age, paternal reproductive age, and birth weight. The optimal set for overweight comprised of five factors: age, fast food intake, maternal BMI, paternal BMI, and sedentary time. For obesity, the optimal set included six factors: age, fast food intake, maternal BMI, paternal BMI, sedentary time, and maternal reproductive age. Further logistic regression analyses confirmed the predictive capability of individual top factors. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that random forest is the best ensemble learning algorithm for predicting underweight, overweight, and obesity in children aged 3-14 years. We identified the optimal set of significant factors for each malnutrition status and incorporated them into a web application to support the application of this study's findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.