Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913535›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2025

Comprehensive proteolytic profiling of Aedes aegypti mosquito midgut extracts: Unraveling the blood meal protein digestion system.

Anthony J O'Donoghue, Chenxi Liu, Carter J Simington, Saira Montermoso, Elizabeth Moreno-Galvez, Mateus Sá M Serafim, Olive E Burata, Rachael M Lucero, James T Nguyen, Daniel Fong and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Enhancing schistosomiasis drug discovery approaches with optimized proteasome substrates.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Anthony J O'DonoghueCenter for Discovery and Innovation in Parasitic Disease, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Chenxi LiuCenter for Discovery and Innovation in Parasitic Disease, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Carter J SimingtonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Saira MontermosoDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Elizabeth Moreno-GalvezDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Mateus Sá M SerafimCenter for Discovery and Innovation in Parasitic Disease, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Olive E BurataDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Rachael M LuceroDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
James T NguyenDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Daniel FongDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Khanh TranDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Neomi MillanDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Jamie M GallimoreDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Kamille ParungaoDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Jonathan FongDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.
Brian M SuzukiCenter for Discovery and Innovation in Parasitic Disease, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Zhenze JiangCenter for Discovery and Innovation in Parasitic Disease, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, United States of America.
Jun IsoeDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America.
Alberto A RascónDepartment of Chemistry, San José State University, San José, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-0430-1834

Funding

Vector Control Strategy Through Inhibition of Aedes aegypti Midgut ProteasesSC3GM116681 · NIGMS · SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY · PI RASCON, ALBERTO A · 2016 to 2023
$847k
The immune serine protease pathways in Anopheles gambiaeR21AI180325 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY STILLWATER · PI JIANG, HAOBO · 2024 to 2025
$409k
NIAID NIH HHS R21 AI180325NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM116681
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To sustain the gonotrophic cycle, the Aedes aegypti mosquito must acquire a blood meal from a human or other vertebrate host. However, in the process of blood feeding, the mosquito may facilitate the transmission of several bloodborne viral pathogens (e.g., dengue, Zika, and chikungunya). The blood meal is essential as it contains proteins that are digested into polypeptides and amino acid nutrients that are eventually used for egg production. These proteins are digested by several midgut proteolytic enzymes. As such, the female mosquito's reliance on blood may serve as a potential target for vector and viral transmission control. However, this strategy may prove to be challenging since midgut proteolytic activity is a complex process dependent on several exo- and endo-proteases. Therefore, to understand the complexity of Ae. aegypti blood meal digestion, we used Multiplex Substrate Profiling by Mass Spectrometry (MSP-MS) to generate global proteolytic profiles of sugar- and blood-fed midgut tissue extracts, along with substrate profiles of recombinantly expressed midgut proteases. Our results reveal a shift from high exoproteolytic activity in sugar-fed mosquitoes to an expressive increase in endoproteolytic activity in blood-fed mosquitoes. This approach allowed for the identification of 146 cleaved peptide bonds (by the combined 6 h and 24 h blood-fed samples) in the MSP-MS substrate library, and of these 146, 99 (68%) were cleaved by the five recombinant proteases evaluated. These reveal the individual contribution of each recombinant midgut protease to the overall blood meal digestion process of the Ae. aegypti mosquito. Further, our molecular docking simulations support the substrate specificity of each recombinant protease. Therefore, the present study provides key information of midgut proteases and the blood meal digestion process in mosquitoes, which may be exploited for the development of potential inhibitor targets for vector and viral transmission control strategies.

Indexed as

AedesInsect ProteinsPeptide HydrolasesAnimalsBloodDigestionFeeding BehaviorFemaleGastrointestinal TractMass SpectrometryMosquito VectorsProteolysisInsect ProteinsPeptide Hydrolases

Identifiers

PMID39913535
PMCPMC11838913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.