ArticleRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025
Validation of childhood lupus specific targets: ensuring accurate assessment of disease control in younger, lighter paediatric patients.
Article in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The 2026 British Society for Rheumatology guideline for the management of children, young people and adults with systemic lupus erythematosus.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Guideline
- Mental health monitoring in adolescents with SLE: associations with lupus low disease activity state and remission.Lupus science & medicine · 2026Article
- Juvenile-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Recent Advances in Pathogenesis and Treatment.Current rheumatology reports · 2025Review
- Achievement and Features Associated with Childhood Definition of Remission in Juvenile-Onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo validate novel childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE) treat-to-target targets including childhood lupus low disease activity state (cLLDAS), cSLE clinical remission on steroids (cCR) and cSLE clinical remission off steroids (cCR-0), as compared with adult-onset SLE (aSLE) targets.
methodsAttainment of the aforementioned cSLE-specific and aSLE-specific targets (LLDAS, DORIS 2021 Remission) was assessed at each visit in UK JSLE Cohort Study patients. Univariable and multivariable Prentice-Williams-Peterson (PWP) gap-time models investigated the impact of target attainment on new damage and severe flare.
resultsThe cohort included 430 cSLE patients. Attainability was comparable between corresponding cSLE and aSLE targets. Achieving cLLDAS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.18 [95% CI: 0.14, 0.23]), cCR (HR 0.18 [0.13, 0.23]) and cCR-0 (HR 0.17 [0.13, 0.23]) reduced the risk of severe flare (all P < 0.001). Risk of new damage was reduced in those reaching cLLDAS (HR 0.22 [0.11, 0.44]), cCR (HR 0.25 [0.13, 0.49]) and cCR-0 (HR 0.30 [0.15, 0.60]) (all P < 0.001). Inappropriate attainment of LLDAS and DORIS remission occurred at 35 and 52 visits, respectively, in younger (median age 7.3 and 8.8 years, respectively) and lighter (median weight 26.8 and 37.1 kg, respectively) patients whilst on prednisolone doses that precluded cSLE target attainment (median 0.17 [IQR 0.16-0.24] and 0.13 [IQR 0.11-0.16] mg/kg/day, respectively).
conclusionsThis study validates novel paediatric-specific targets, demonstrating that achieving cLLDAS, cCR and cCR-0 reduces risks of new damage and severe flare, which is comparable to aSLE targets. Using cSLE-specific targets prevents misclassification of disease activity in paediatric patients, enabling more accurate disease control assessments in younger, lighter patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.