ArticlePloS one2025
Re-calibrating measurements of low-cost air quality monitors using PCR-GPR air quality forecasting models.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
As a key tool for real-time monitoring of air pollutant concentrations, the chemical sensor, the core component of the low-cost Air Quality Monitor (AQM), is susceptible to a variety of factors during the measurement process, leading to errors in the measurement data. To enhance the measurement accuracy of chemical sensors, this paper presents a calibration method based on the PCR-GPR model. This method not only effectively enhances the measurement accuracy of chemical sensors, but also combines the interpretability of traditional statistical models with the high-precision characteristics of Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) models. First, we perform Principal Component Analysis (PCA) on the measurement data of the AQM to solve the multicollinearity problem. Through PCA, we successfully extracted 8 principal components, which not only contained 95% of the information in the original data, but also effectively eliminated the correlation between the variables, providing a more robust data base for subsequent modeling. Subsequently, we established a Principal Component Regression (PCR) model using the concentration of pollutants measured by the national monitoring station as the dependent variable and the 8 principal components extracted above as the independent variables. The PCR model can effectively extract the linear relationship between the independent and dependent variables, providing a linear part of the explanation for the calibration process. However, there are often complex nonlinear relationships between pollutant concentrations and AQM measurements. To capture these nonlinear relationships, we further established a GPR model with the residuals of the PCR model as the dependent variable and the measurement data of the AQM as the independent variable. By combining the PCR model and the GPR model, we obtained the final PCR-GPR calibration model. It is worth mentioning that this study adopted the time series cross-validation method for data grouping, an innovative approach that is more aligned with real-world scenarios and adequately captures the seasonal variations in pollutant concentrations. The experimental results show that the model exhibits excellent performance on several evaluation metrics and can calibrate the chemical sensor well, improving its measurement accuracy by 16.94% ~ 82.01%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.