ArticlePloS one2025
Perinatal intimate partner violence and breastfeeding practices: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Caring as a potential existential refuge from intimate partner violence during the breastfeeding period: a reflective lifeworld study.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntimate partner violence increases the risk of detrimental health, behaviors and psychological issues in mothers, affecting infant nutrition and development. However, the potential effects of maternal exposure to intimate partner violence on breastfeeding practices are understudied, and the results of individual studies are inconsistent and conflicting. The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are therefore to 1) estimate the prevalence of perinatal intimate partner violence and, 2) examine the relationship between perinatal intimate partner violence and breastfeeding outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will investigate the association between perinatal intimate partner violence and breastfeeding outcomes, including early initiation within 1 hour after giving birth, exclusive breastfeeding under six months, and continued breastfeeding at two years or beyond. Comprehensive searches will be conducted in PsycInfo, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, Cochrane, JBI EBP, CINAHL, Informit, and PubMed electronic databases. Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers, with discrepancies resolved by a third reviewer. Statistical analysis will be conducted using STATA/SE version 17, employing random-effects models to calculate pooled effect sizes and assess heterogeneity with I2 and Chi-square tests. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression will explore potential sources of heterogeneity. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionEvidence suggests that intimate partner violence is linked to poor breastfeeding outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis will update, compile, and critically review the evidence of the role of intimate partner violence on breastfeeding outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis will also inform effective strategies and interventions to support breastfeeding among IPV-affected women, thereby enhancing maternal and child health. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As this review and meta-analysis involves secondary analysis of existing data, ethical approval is not required. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and scientific conferences, aiming to inform strategies to support breastfeeding among women affected by intimate partner violence. STUDY REGISTRATION: This protocol is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO), registration number CRD42024555048.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.