Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913463›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Comparisons of performances of structural variants detection algorithms in solitary or combination strategy.

De-Min Duan, Chinyi Cheng, Yu-Shu Huang, An-Ko Chung, Pin-Xuan Chen, Yu-An Chen, Jacob Shujui Hsu, Pei-Lung Chen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

De-Min DuanGraduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6165-2032
Chinyi ChengGraduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8418-2259
Yu-Shu HuangGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
An-Ko ChungDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pin-Xuan ChenGraduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yu-An ChenGraduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jacob Shujui HsuGraduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-5343
Pei-Lung ChenGraduate Institute of Medical Genomics and Proteomics, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variants (SVs) have been associated with changes in gene expression, which may contribute to alterations in phenotypes and disease development. However, the precise identification and characterization of SVs remain challenging. While long-read sequencing offers superior accuracy for SV detection, short-read sequencing remains essential due to practical and cost considerations, as well as the need to analyze existing short-read datasets. Numerous algorithms for short-read SV detection exist, but none are universally optimal, each having limitations for specific SV sizes and types. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of six advanced SV detection algorithms, including the commercial software DRAGEN, using the GIAB v0.6 Tier 1 benchmark and HGSVC2 cell lines. We employed both individual and combination strategies, with systematic assessments of recall, precision, and F1 scores. Our results demonstrate that the union combination approach enhanced detection capabilities, surpassing single algorithms in identifying deletions and insertions, and delivered comparable recall and F1 scores to the commercial software DRAGEN. Interestingly, expanding the number of algorithms from three to five in the combination did not enhance performance, highlighting the efficiency of a well-chosen ensemble over a larger algorithmic pool.

Indexed as

Detection AlgorithmsGenomic Structural VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID39913463
PMCPMC11801633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.