Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39913419›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Adaptive enhancement of shoulder x-ray images using tissue attenuation and type-II fuzzy sets.

Qifeng Liu, Yong Han, Lu Shen, Jialei Du, Marzia Hoque Tania

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qifeng LiuCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0003-1526-8173
Yong HanSchool of Software Engineering, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Lu ShenInternational Digital Economy College, Minjiang University, Fuzhou, China.
Jialei DuBusiness School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Marzia Hoque TaniaCentre for Big Data Research in Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4496-1896

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shoulder X-ray images typically have low contrast and high noise levels, making it challenging to distinguish and identify subtle anatomical structures. While existing image enhancement techniques are effective in improving contrast, they often overlook the enhancement of sharpness, especially when amplifying blurring and noise. These techniques may improve detail contrast but fail to maintain overall image clarity and the distinction between the target and the background. To address these issues, we propose a novel image enhancement method aimed at simultaneously improving both the contrast and sharpness of shoulder X-ray images. The method integrates automatic tissue attenuation techniques, which enhance the image contrast by removing non-essential tissue components while preserving important tissues and bones. Additionally, we apply an improved Type-II fuzzy set algorithm to further optimize image sharpness. By simultaneously enhancing contrast and sharpness, the method significantly improves image quality and detail distinguishability. When tested on certain images from the MURA dataset, the proposed method achieved the best or second-best results, outperforming five no-reference image quality assessment metrics. In comparative studies, the method demonstrated significant performance advantages over 10 contemporary X-ray image enhancement algorithms and was validated through ablation experiments to confirm the effectiveness of each module.

Indexed as

Fuzzy LogicRadiographic Image EnhancementShoulderAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39913419
PMCPMC11801559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.