ArticlePloS one2025
Saturated Transposon Analysis in Yeast as a one-step method to quantify the fitness effects of gene disruptions on a genome-wide scale.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Progresses of transposon research inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Review
- ProteomeLM: A proteome-scale language model enables accurate and rapid prediction of protein-protein interactions and gene essentiality across taxa.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Global genetic rewiring during compensatory evolution in the yeast polarity network.EMBO reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transposon insertion site sequencing (TIS) is a powerful tool that has significantly advanced our knowledge of functional genomics. For example, TIS has been used to identify essential genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, screen for antibiotic resistance genes in Klebsiella pneumoniae and determine the set of genes required for virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. While providing valuable insights, these applications of TIS focus on (conditional) gene essentiality and neglect possibly interesting but subtle differences in the importance of genes for fitness. Notably, it has been demonstrated that data obtained from TIS experiments can be used for fitness quantification and the construction of genetic interaction maps, but this potential is only sporadically exploited. Here, we present a method to quantify the fitness of gene disruption mutants using data obtained from a TIS screen developed for the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae called SATAY. We show that the mean read count per transposon insertion site provides a metric for fitness that is robust across biological and technical replicate experiments. Importantly, the ability to resolve differences between gene disruption mutants with low fitness depends crucially on the inclusion of insertion sites that are not observed in the sequencing data to estimate the mean. While our method provides reproducible results between replicate SATAY datasets, the obtained fitness distribution differs substantially from those obtained using other techniques. It is currently unclear whether these inconsistencies are due to biological or technical differences between the methods. We end with suggestions for modifications of the SATAY procedure that could improve the resolution of the fitness estimates. Our analysis indicates that increasing the sequencing depth does very little to reduce the uncertainty in the estimates, while replacing the PCR amplification with methods that avoid or reduce the number of amplification cycles will likely be most effective in reducing noise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.